New Mesa Mark amp coming?

paisleywookiee said:
Anyone notice Mesa posting daily posts on FB about the Mark series, starting with the Mark I, then each day incrementing up, which would lead us to......what, on Tuesday? Hmmm......
Click to expand...


giphy.gif
 
paisleywookiee said:
Anyone notice Mesa posting daily posts on FB about the Mark series, starting with the Mark I, then each day incrementing up, which would lead us to......what, on Tuesday? Hmmm......
Click to expand...
Yes I noticed that , I thought it was odd on Instagram when they posted all the Mark heads stacked
The have definitely been talking Marks a lot
 
I’ve never owned a Mesa, but dug the couple times I played a Mark combo. (Particularly the last time, once I knew how to properly dial the thing in) I hope this is released on a day I’m not bored and careless. :ROFLMAO:
 
I could see a need for something more than my Mark V 90
2 of my Favorite Sounds reside on Channel 2 (Crunch & Mark I) & you cannot switch between those Live.... on my QC I can, but sometimes I like to take a real Amp to Practice...
 
TubeStack said:
Full midi +IRs will put it ahead of the V, I imagine.
Click to expand...
Not having MIDI on the V is definitely one of Mesa's stupidest decisions. In fact many other manufacturers make this blunder too. Like if you have 5 different switchable things, just use MIDI! I just see no drawback to this. I used to use the RJM Mini Amp Gizmo to control a Bogner that didn't have MIDI and it worked just as fast as the stock foot controller.

Wishlist:
  • MIDI.
  • Lineout with or without IRs that can also be used silently.
  • Either multiple graphic EQs like JP2C or a digitally controlled per channel EQ.
  • No reverb built in. There's so many good pedals that are just plain better.
  • Doesn't weigh as much as a brick shithouse. Since it's Mesa, that's probably not gonna happen.
  • Multiple identical channels with switchable voicings. This avoids that "my favorite sounds are on the same channel" dilemma.
 
laxu said:
Not having MIDI on the V is definitely one of Mesa's stupidest decisions. In fact many other manufacturers make this blunder too. Like if you have 5 different switchable things, just use MIDI! I just see no drawback to this. I used to use the RJM Mini Amp Gizmo to control a Bogner that didn't have MIDI and it worked just as fast as the stock foot controller.

Wishlist:
  • MIDI.
  • Lineout with or without IRs that can also be used silently.
  • Either multiple graphic EQs like JP2C or a digitally controlled per channel EQ.
  • No reverb built in. There's so many good pedals that are just plain better.
  • Doesn't weigh as much as a brick shithouse. Since it's Mesa, that's probably not gonna happen.
  • Multiple identical channels with switchable voicings. This avoids that "my favorite sounds are on the same channel" dilemma.
Click to expand...
Meh Kinda GIF by Cultura
 
laxu said:
Not having MIDI on the V is definitely one of Mesa's stupidest decisions. In fact many other manufacturers make this blunder too. Like if you have 5 different switchable things, just use MIDI! I just see no drawback to this. I used to use the RJM Mini Amp Gizmo to control a Bogner that didn't have MIDI and it worked just as fast as the stock foot controller.
Click to expand...

I think maybe companies don't want to scare away tube simpletons with extensive midi? (I include myself in that group.) They later did it pretty well in the TC50, although I think only channel-switching was midi-controllable and not all the switches were.

laxu said:
Wishlist:
  • MIDI.
  • Lineout with or without IRs that can also be used silently.
  • Either multiple graphic EQs like JP2C or a digitally controlled per channel EQ.
Click to expand...

laxu said:
  • No reverb built in. There's so many good pedals that are just plain better.
Click to expand...

You had me up until here. I love Mesa's reverb and I love that I can just turn it on and set/forget, while also saving DSP (although that's not a concern as much now with my FM9).


laxu said:
  • Doesn't weigh as much as a brick shithouse. Since it's Mesa, that's probably not gonna happen.
Click to expand...

They seem to be working on this. Most of their recent amps are pretty light, relative to older ones. At least it seems that way, haven't extensively compared. But the TC50 and Fillmores are pretty light.


laxu said:
  • Multiple identical channels with switchable voicings. This avoids that "my favorite sounds are on the same channel" dilemma.
Click to expand...

Big yes.
 
laxu said:
Multiple identical channels with switchable voicings. This avoids that "my favorite sounds are on the same channel" dilemma.
Click to expand...

100%

I’ve come close to buying a Mini Rec twice, just to have a Rec, but I liked all the voicings and knew it would piss me off not being able to freely use them all. Pass.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

spawnofthesith
Lets talk about Mesa 2x12s (and more)
2 3 4
Replies
61
Views
2K
spawnofthesith
spawnofthesith
C
Mesa Boogie Mark GAS-X Please!
Replies
13
Views
774
EOengineer
E
Deadpan
Help Me Pick a New Amp...Please :)
2 3 4
Replies
74
Views
4K
RaceU4her
RaceU4her
Iron1
NAD: Enter the Badlands
2
Replies
22
Views
2K
NKP
NKP
laxu
Aging amp/fx models?
Replies
17
Views
1K
paisleywookiee
paisleywookiee
Back
Top