gearJunkie
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,700
I didn't know that "Thir13 Ghosts" (2001) was a remake. Now I must see the original.Thursday - 13 Ghosts (1960)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eafe/9eafee8afa62e7dba83aa35e4ca06a2a1ff5e5fc" alt="cheers :beer :beer"
I didn't know that "Thir13 Ghosts" (2001) was a remake. Now I must see the original.Thursday - 13 Ghosts (1960)
Took me a few reads to figure out WTF you were trying to say there :)SoaceX Fakcon 9
damn fat fingers!Took me a few reads to figure out WTF you were trying to say there :)
SpaceX Falcon 9
It's from William Castle, whom I believe also did House on Haunted Hill.I didn't know that "Thir13 Ghosts" (2001) was a remake. Now I must see the original.
![]()
Lmfao just fucking no. It was eyerollingly awful when Jason Momoa was tied to this shitfest. Whomever this doofus is makes this look worse than any of the straight to Sci Fi sequels they did. Yuck.
Watch they attempt to do 80s goth like Siouxsie, Cure, etc. LmaoWhat is even going to be the soundtrack to this? Bullet for My Valentine, Imagine Dragons, and Sleep Token? The Crow is so of its time this remake is absurd.
It will most definitely have an normally upbeat 80s song slowed down 4x and sang with some breathless junkie vocal.Watch they attempt to do 80s goth like Siouxsie, Cure, etc. Lmao
That faux neo jazz pop girl cover song wank that gets used these days is obnoxiously bad. Whoever started it should have to step on a room full of small Legos.It will most definitely have an normally upbeat 80s song slowed down 4x and sang with some breathless junkie vocal.
You know Hollywood ran out of compelling movie ideas decades ago,
when they are remaking awful movies now from decades ago that were
awful back then.![]()
It's more like that the executives running the show are hedging on safe bets. Remaking a movie gen X and early millenials liked (even moderately) is a sure way to get some asses in seats, so is sequel X to a franchise.You know Hollywood ran out of compelling movie ideas decades ago
when they are remaking movies from decades ago that were awful
decades ago.![]()
Every point here is spot on.It's more like that the executives running the show are hedging on safe bets. Remaking a movie gen X and early millenials liked (even moderately) is a sure way to get some asses in seats, so is sequel X to a franchise.
What these execs don't seem to understand is that you don't get new lucrative franchises without taking risks. Then when they do pick something new, there seems to be incompetence all around:
It's frankly amazing that actually good movies/TV still get made. Now I'm not some moviegoer who only goes to see art films, I enjoy a good blockbuster movie just fine, but I'd still like the bar to be higher. Most of the actual good stuff is in TV series these days.
- Super predictable plot lines any regular movie viewer can guess within the first 15 minutes. It's so by-the-numbers that it's annoying.
- Dialogue that sucks. Again super tropey stuff.
- If it's based on a book series, changes to the source material where none was needed. Altered Carbon and The Witcher are good examples. Especially AC is terrible because they just added extra drama that it never needed, then shoehorned two books together when they work perfectly well as standalone material.
- Spending all your money on an all star cast, then not having a script that makes good use of them. Kingsman: The Golden Circle is a great example, it's a terrible movie with a lot of big name actors basically there for a paycheck.
- The usual marketing that basically shows the whole movie in a trailer. I don't see much need to see The Crow after that trailer, I can fill in everything that happens between the cuts.
- Following stupid trends. Vomit inducing shakycam, nanosecond cuts to different camera angles, those slowed down cover songs.
- Studio meddling where changes are made to appease focus groups or producers thinking they know better.