Funny all of this pops up. I was questioning the numbers I was seeing, but then realized that you can vote multiple times. As a result, one "owner" could have checked the box for more than one unit. If you do the math and take the total number of "No" respondents, and divide that by total number of respondents, that is the number you are seeing for the "No" crowd. But that also allows higher numbers for the other categories as some have voted twice. The way the math should be done on this, IMO, is if someone checks the box on more than one choice, then it should only assign a percentage of that vote to the selections made. So if someone check two boxes, then each check gives only 0.5 votes to each selection. If they check 3 boxes, then it would only assign .33 votes to each selection in that users choices.
You will notice that if you add up the %, you will get more than 100%, which is just bad stats IMO! This is the fault of the way this system calculates this stuff and not the fault of the OP. Here is the data I put together on Dec 02 regarding this, but had not found the time to post and was questioning whether I even would do so, but considering the new discussion on the topic, here it be (note: these numbers were calculated when there was 166 voters counted on Dec 2, 2023):
FXIII 29.5%
FM9 24.7%
FM3 19.9%
Legacy 9.6%
Total voters
166
29.5+24.7+19.9+9.6=83.7% (% of fractal users - skewed data because of being able to vote for multiple items)
83.7+39.2=122.9% (total % of all votes, because it is not calculated properly IMO, could also be skewed for reasons similar to above)
65/204=0.3186274509803922 (number of "No" responses divided by the total checked boxes)
139/204=0.6813725490196078 (number of "Fractal" checked boxes divided by the total checked boxes)
NOTE: Even after all this math, we could still have some discrepancies because someone could vote for all choices, including "No", claiming that they own all in the Fractal categories and also "No", but I have not reviewed the respondents to detail whether anybody had done as such.