- Messages
- 470
You just had to get that poor guy going again didn’t youThe best Friedman is actually the original Fractal HBE model!![]()
No joke on that. When I bought an actual BE-100 I was disappointed.The best Friedman is actually the original Fractal HBE model!![]()
Agreed I've played this exact model and you can go as dark or bright tonally as you want.In the raw playthrough/dialing in section you can hear how much brightness there is on tap and it's way more than anybody would ever need! At least these controls have a lot of range, that's not something that can be said about a lot of Marshalls.
WELL IF THAT AIN'T THE HONEST TO GOD TRUTH.The best Friedman is actually the original Fractal HBE model!![]()
Yes, well, here I am... well, tbh I was lurking on this thread ever since @GuitarJon posted, but yes, I will always take every opportunity I can get to mention just how amazing the Ares-era Friedmans were. Now if only @FractalAudio were to re-release the "idealised" Ares-era HBE C45 as a FAS model, I will shut up about this forever.You just had to get that poor guy going again didn’t you![]()
For heavy/metal I prefer 100 watters, but for everything else I think 50 generally sounds better.I prefer the 50.
Finding myself lost in the middle here. I understand why some find the BE kind of bloated - it can come off that way COMPARATIVELY if a 2203 is your reference…but I really like the BE for certain sounds. The smoothness can be a feature.it’s a forum myth/exaggeration for the most part. Plexi is a one trick pony, the BE is way more versatile.
I don’t really think of a 2203 as being brighter than a BE100. Less bass, largely down to the depth circuit and I guess that can make it sound thinner. 2203 gets pretty bloated in the mids when the master hits a certain point. I can’t really think of a situation where a tone that works for a Marshall wouldn’t work on a Friedman, it’s sort of hairsplitting IMO. I find Bogner XTC or Soldano’s way more thick/less bite, for example. I don’t even think of the BE as particularly smooth, it’s just not obliterating a phase inverter with level like a 100W SL is.Finding myself lost in the middle here. I understand why some find the BE kind of bloated - it can come off that way COMPARATIVELY if a 2203 is your reference…but I really like the BE for certain sounds. The smoothness can be a feature.
I mean, talk me through how effective the EQ is. On some versions of the circuit, even the gain control doesn’t do a great deal.I definitely disagree and borderline take offense to calling the Plexi a one trick pony though
It is, but not really from the amp doing much different. Hendrix Plexi circuit is a bit different to the AJ config, but assuming they were both plugged into the same amp, the difference in tone would be WAY more down to:Stretching the definition to Superlead, you can do everything from Hendrix to Tool with a 1959. Those are definitely different tricks.
Are those knobs supposed to do something? I thought they were decorative.I mean, talk me through how effective the EQ is. On some versions of the circuit, even the gain control doesn’t do a great deal.
some context for the kind of differences. My 1977 JMP 2203 and Friedman BE100. Not trying to match them exactly, BE100 isn't a 2203 based circuit and there are supposed to be differences between them. I did it in Drop C just to rule out that "standard tuning" thing.
Other way around, A is BE100 and B is JMP.So A is the JMP and B is the BE100 ??