- Messages
- 5,856
Randall confirms at 0:40 that the IIC+ RI was his project. So any speculation about the RI being some bad blood with him can be laid to rest, turns out it was his grand finale
Agreed. I am in the same boat. I love mine, especially after jamming live with it.The VII is an absolute beast. I’m still% happy with it.
Agreed. I am in the same boat. I love mine, especially after jamming live with it.
I wonder how many knobs, modes, and switches were on his termination letter.
He just went to the Gibson office and dropped an envelope filled with orange drop caps.I wonder how many knobs, modes, and switches were on his termination letter.
Yup. This is Fillmore’s last year, and only the 50 remains right now. Multiwatt is already gone.I heard a couple rumors that the Fillmore is being discontinued, and that the multi watt is being un-discontinued
Aside from the tone, the options on a Mesa are the feature and the main reason I play them.I wonder how many knobs, modes, and switches were on his termination letter.
I think he is in full retirement mode. Watch his vids on YouTube, he seems happy where he is.Wow, really? Good thing I already snagged a pre-Gibson Fillmore a few years back. Wonder if it's gonna go up in value.
Regarding the OP, I wonder where or if Randall Smith takes his talents to next?
View attachment 39020
One man’s features is another man’s tone suckers.Aside from the tone, the options on a Mesa are the feature and the main reason I play them.
Tone is in the suckerOne man’s features is another man’s tone suckers.
I honestly haven't found a whole lot of truth to that with any amp I've owned.One man’s features is another man’s tone suckers.
I have no issue with complexity as long as it’s not a barrier to dialing in a good tone or makes people want to turn knobs all day. Some amps definitely are in that realm for me and IME Mesa has made more than most that did that for me. YMMV for the overly sensitive. I own simple and complex amps so it’s not that complexity that keeps we away it’s how it’s implemented and how they effect the tone, which they definitely do, especially if they impede you getting good tone fast.I honestly haven't found a whole lot of truth to that with any amp I've owned.
A single channel on my Mesa Mark V isn't necessarily that much more complex as a circuit than say a Dumble, or whatever corksniffery amp people want to hold as their "pure tone" benchmark. The "pure tone" being an oxymoron in itself...
A lot of the complexity is in offering the user all the toggle options and whatnot that in any other amp would be just something that is set a particular way with fixed components. To be fair, that sort of curation can be useful as many amps out there have a particular "sounds best this way" arrangement for toggles like that.
I'd expect the Fillmore is about the same complexity as the clean channel with all its modes on the Mark V, but to the purist, the Fillmore just has to be more "pure" because it has less knobs and toggles on it.