Mesa Mark V Head: Excellent Shape $1,800 !?!?!?

It's about people being unable to afford to live. The economy has been soundly tanked, and in America it costs the average household $12,000 more annually to maintain the same standard of living that we had five years ago. People are struggling.

I can believe that.

Someone put it in perspective for me the other day. Not everyone works at companies like Google and Meta that pay entry level personnel hundreds of thousands of dollars. Problem is that staffers at these companies have so much disposable income that they don’t blink at the cost of groceries or transport or indulgences like guitar amps.

It skews the playing field for everyone else, especially daily minimum wage earners. So the crème de la crème has no problem with it, it’s just the bottom feeders like me.

That said, over the years, there has been a general decline in amp sales, and the amp manufacturers will be the first to tell you about it, because of the rapid improvements in modelling and profiling technology. A guy sees a huge band like Metallica or Megadeth using modellers and thinks to himself, “Why not?”

It’s only boomers like me who still maintain that there’s nothing like a cranked amp in the room. Most of the kids are dreaming about Axe FXs and Kempers. And why not? Even in a live situation, stages have increasingly grown quiet and modellers are praised by sound men for allowing them to get a good mix.

So yeah, totally agree about the cost of living crisis. Yesterday I paid $6 for a plate of chicken rice (there were options for $4/$5/$6 plates) and at the end of the meal I was still hungry due to shrinkflation. A couple of days before that my brother was in town visiting and we thought we’d get some rosti at this nice restaurant we like. Price was still the same at the $25.90 per plate. But the rosti had shrunk in size by one-third by my estimate.

Everything is more expensive and products are shrinking in size. You buy a bag of chips and there’s more air in it than wafers.

But at the same time, amps have been declining in popularity. That’s why the manufacturers are charging huge amounts for them nowadays, since the volumes are small.
 
To be honest, once the set starts my tone is the last thing I’m thinking about unless something is sounding egregiously wrong/bad :LOL:


Loop Smoking GIF by Psyklon
 
Gonna take my own advice and play the shit I have before I buy more shit. :brick


Wish me luck! Or not. :rofl

Here's a helpful little life hack: When you're jonesing for something new, look through the pile of stuff you already have and pick something you haven't touched in a while. Now go to YouTube and start watching reviews and demos on it, and next thing you know you'll have a renewed interest in it.
 
Gonna take my own advice and play the shit I have before I buy more shit. :brick


Wish me luck! Or not. :rofl


This cured me of my spell of insanity a couple weeks ago! Completely gas free of a badlander or a strandberg, and tele





Now I'm just gasing over a 10 top tremonti I stumbled across :sofa
 
This cured me of my spell of insanity a couple weeks ago! Completely gas free of a badlander or a strandberg, and tele





Now I'm just gasing over a 10 top tremonti I stumbled across :sofa

I've been jonesing hard for a Studio JTM. I don't NEED it, but I think it's cool as fuck and I WANT it. So I have been spending some quality time with the Axe-FX 3 and the JTM in there, which has reigned in my irrational impulses for the time being.
 
I get great tones without the GEQ on virtually every Mark series amp I have owned.

It's not essential.

I also think the GEQ and the dreaded V curve is a massive crutch that can be more
of a curse than a blessing. I bet there are players who have never heard a Mark
amp with the GEQ off. :crazy
I disagree. It's possible to get decent cleans and crunch sounds out of it, but I think the GEQ is essential to lead tones. This is based on experience with the III, IV, V, V:25/35, JP-2C, and VII. I mean, there aren't any rules, obviously. If you dig it, you dig it. But to me, the regular EQ is like sticking a 3-band EQ in front of an amp, whereas the GEQ is the real EQ of the amp.
 
Tonestacks are ubiquitous on every guitar amp, but post-EQs are not. :idk Could
just as easily say stick a 5 Band EQ in the loop of any amp and there's your add-on
GEQ.

I do think the GEQ is brilliant... and iconic. I use it. I am just saying that a lot
of people with Mark experience never even try to get a tone from the tonestack
and develop an over-reliance on the GEQ, by fiddle-fucking with the broad sweeps
you get with micro-movements from the sliders. Can sink as easily as swim with that,
especially when playing with others and trying to get the mids to sit just right and
not be too in your face, or too scooped and empty.

Just like encouraging people to try things that not a lot ever think to do. :idk

I agree that there are tones in a Mark amp with the GEQ that you can't get with the GEQ
disengaged, just as there are tones with the GEQ disengaged that you can't get with it engaged.
For example, my experience is British/Crunch tones are more easily achieved with it off, and just
using the tonestack.

Nice to see you back around. :cheers
 
Back
Top