- Messages
- 15,027
Jumped?
Nope. Al and Michael didn't, so I am not currently either. :lol
6550s in the Power Amp, too.
I didn't know Schenker and he did mostly the same thing when it came to "dialing in" their Marshalls.
Hard to argue with.
Jumped?
Honestly, I didn’t even experiment a whole lot with pedals before digital, let alone modding amps or swapping out speakers. The amount of wasted money and time just did not appeal to me - much less did I have any clue about most of the amp circuit stuff. I don’t think I ever would have had a drawer full of overdrive pedals to experiment with stacking, etc. I would have gone to a store, tried out overdrive pedals and bought the one I liked the most. Lived with it unless/until I couldn’t anymore and then sell it and repeat. Before “modeling”.How many of us spent tons of time hooking up different combinations of pedals, rolling tubes, swapping out speakers, clipping caps, removing negative feedback loops, etc. with analog gear?
The only difference is that with digital it’s all in one box so I’m not buying as much stuff to experiment with.
With the knobs like that, you basically have pretty flat highs and mids with a hump in the bass/low mid frequencies. Plus it's not like a Marshall tone stack has a lot of range in the first place...I'm into the Al DiMeola method of dialing in a Plexi at the moment. Never did it before,
and then also found out Micheal Schenker also dialed in Superleads and 2204s the same
way.
Bass cranked. Mids cranked. Treble at Zero. Presence to taste. Sounds surprisingly amazing.
Ok, I guess it should not be that surprising given their iconic status.
Honestly, I didn’t even experiment a whole lot with pedals before digital, let alone modding amps or swapping out speakers. The amount of wasted money and time just did not appeal to me - much less did I have any clue about most of the amp circuit stuff. I don’t think I ever would have had a drawer full of overdrive pedals to experiment with stacking, etc. I would have gone to a store, tried out overdrive pedals and bought the one I liked the most. Lived with it unless/until I couldn’t anymore and then sell it and repeat. Before “modeling”.
Honestly, at this point, I also feel like I’ve explored enough options in both digital and analog world to know what I want. I’m pretty well past the”I wonder what happens if Input X into Y? Is that a sound I might find useful or inspiring in a different way?”
Yes, I expect to need to turn some knobs to get a new device working. But I don’t want to feel like I’m having to search for a sound in the device - like, if I just want the sound of a reverb tank into a tweed-style amp with a Celestion speaker and not-a-dynamic-mic, I don’t want to have to get into “hmm, maybe if I use the the Kuku boost and then run the reverb parallel full wet and compress the tail of the reverb in front of the Supro style amp and then make sure I have a tape saturate on the back end it might get closer to what I’m looking for than just reverb-tweed-cab?
With digital I love doing things like trying to play Metallica with a Princeton. Just for fun
I just stumbled on one of my favorite clean tones I’ve ever had.
Plexi 50w High 1
Gain: 2.96
Bass: 10
Mid: 0
Treble: 6.27
Presence: 7.14
Fat: ON
Bright Cap: ~70pF
Preamp Tube Type: 7025
Power Tube Type: 6V6GT GE
Negative Feedback: 10
4x12 1960TV dyna cab
The added negative feedback gives it a similar attack to a Fender, the lower bright cap fattens it up, and the tubes push it more into Fender territory. But it still has the flatter EQ of a Marshall, the tighter and more focused low end of a Marshall, and a bit more character to the tone than a typical Fender.
It’s like a Marshder… or a Fendshall?
Saving this to try out laterI just stumbled on one of my favorite clean tones I’ve ever had.
Plexi 50w High 1
Gain: 2.96
Bass: 10
Mid: 0
Treble: 6.27
Presence: 7.14
Fat: ON
Bright Cap: ~70pF
Preamp Tube Type: 7025
Power Tube Type: 6V6GT GE
Negative Feedback: 10
4x12 1960TV dyna cab
The added negative feedback gives it a similar attack to a Fender, the lower bright cap fattens it up, and the tubes push it more into Fender territory. But it still has the flatter EQ of a Marshall, the tighter and more focused low end of a Marshall, and a bit more character to the tone than a typical Fender.
It’s like a Marshder… or a Fendshall?
I just stumbled on one of my favorite clean tones I’ve ever had.
Plexi 50w High 1
Gain: 2.96
Bass: 10
Mid: 0
Treble: 6.27
Presence: 7.14
Fat: ON
Bright Cap: ~70pF
Preamp Tube Type: 7025
Power Tube Type: 6V6GT GE
Negative Feedback: 10
4x12 1960TV dyna cab
The added negative feedback gives it a similar attack to a Fender, the lower bright cap fattens it up, and the tubes push it more into Fender territory. But it still has the flatter EQ of a Marshall, the tighter and more focused low end of a Marshall, and a bit more character to the tone than a typical Fender.
It’s like a Marshder… or a Fendshall?
Maybe something like this?So if I wanted to expand my Axe3 setup to include my two Meris pedals, as well as run in 4-cable-method with my Mark V.... how would I do that?
And what would the setup look like... a 5U rack case with the Axe3 at the bottom... Meris pedals on top... EM midi switcher next to them.... maybe a little patch bay....
I'm thinking very naughty things.
Cheers man.Maybe something like this?
Preset routing:
- Guitar -> IN 1
- OUT3 L -> Mark V input
- Mark V fx send -> IN3 L
- OUT4 L -> Mark V fx return
- OUT 1 L/R -> Meris pedals
- Meris out L/R -> IN2 L/R
If you want to really get crazy with each Meris pedal in its own loop, then:
- Row 1: IN1 -> pre-fx -> OUT3
- Row 2: IN3 -> post-fx -> OUT1 -> IN2 -> more fx -> OUT4
Then your preset routing would be something like:
- OUT 1 L/R -> Meris 1 -> IN 2 L/R
- OUT2 (XLR -> 1/4" cables) L/R -> Meris 2 -> IN 4 L/R
- Row 1: IN1 -> pre-fx -> OUT3
- Row 2: IN3 -> post-fx -> OUT1 -> IN2 -> more fx -> OUT4
- Row 3: merge to row after IN3 -> OUT2 -> IN4 -> merge before OUT4
If you still want to be able to use the Axe knobs, I'd go pedals below the Axe -- you are coming straight down onto pedals from above, so having them a little lower isn't problematic. However, I find with the Axe UI being in a vertical plane, having it too low, even if I already know what knob I want to turn, is really annoying, really quickly. If you need to see the screen...the higher the better.So if I wanted to expand my Axe3 setup to include my two Meris pedals, as well as run in 4-cable-method with my Mark V.... how would I do that?
And what would the setup look like... a 5U rack case with the Axe3 at the bottom... Meris pedals on top... EM midi switcher next to them.... maybe a little patch bay....
I'm thinking very naughty things.
You can probably buy a rack mount kit for the amp from Mesa. At least the JP2C model looks like it's nothing but a metal plate to mount the amp and a front panel to cover the tubes and transformers.Cheers man.
It could be something to try. I'm quite curious about putting it all in a rack box. I sorta wish I had a rackmount Mark Five as well now!
That would be doper than the pope, as my ol' granpappy Orville would've said.You can probably buy a rack mount kit for the amp from Mesa. At least the JP2C model looks like it's nothing but a metal plate to mount the amp and a front panel to cover the tubes and transformers.
Yep, received the email today as well and it's 899€ in EU (50€ more than expected).On another topic... VP4's are about to arrive in the UK. £749 is the final price.
That looks awesome. I wish Mesa made a Killy rack mount preamp nowadays.You can probably buy a rack mount kit for the amp from Mesa. At least the JP2C model looks like it's nothing but a metal plate to mount the amp and a front panel to cover the tubes and transformers.
I'm debating it still. When it was announced, I was a dead cert. But then I sorta thought about it... and well... basically, I have too many options, and so that is giving me pause.Yep, received the email today as well and it's 899€ in EU (50€ more than expected).
And I just passed