Cabinetron is very good - there are loads of tweakable features and it has the excellent Kirchhoff EQ
1.0.1 has some bugs that's crashing my StudioOne and Cubase. Other than that it's great. I did a little bit of a match EQ faceoff between Ozone MatchEQ, Cabinetron, Melda's MfreeformEQ and Fabfilter Match EQ.
Or no noticeable effect at all.
+1. I have a preorder QC. The touchscreen is way better than on release. It's absolutely no problem. Much better than my Steam Deck (which is fine for the most part) for example. they have bigger fish to fry for sure. Easily good enough for this kind of application and far and away the best of any MFX processor I've used.This seems hugely exaggerated, or maybe they’ve improved the touchscreen since yours?
My newer one works very well, rarely requires a re-touch.
I do think one can run the risk of appeasing those who don't 
I think it’s interesting because in a lot of ways the modelling is only as good as what the end user is able to achieve. The modelling itself obviously has to deliver, but likewise, the user needs to be able to take advantage with minimum barriers/effort. We may even be at that point already - are most users really taking the fullest advantage of where modelling is at there days? how many users don’t realise they are using the “wrong” input level in a plugin? how many aren’t even using DI boxes?I think this is important. Not everyone's feedback as an end user is valid. Just don't tell them that.
Maybe my feedback is not valid.
know what they don't know (about how actual amps sound and interact with cabs and all that jazz),
and then that becomes a slippery slope of granting the wishes to those whose inexperience and naivete
is obvious to everyone but themselves.
How much ignorance and lack of effort
this is huge.I think this is important. Not everyone's feedback as an end user is valid. Just don't tell them that.
Maybe my feedback is not valid.
know what they don't know (about how actual amps sound and interact with cabs and all that jazz),
and then that becomes a slippery slope of granting the wishes to those whose inexperience and naivete
is obvious to everyone but themselves.
Old concepts for an old guyIf that sounds like it came from an old-ish guy it totally did.
gets into cat and mouse at where you draw the line. Modellers by their very nature are designed for convenience and cost. Amps and recording gear are mass produced and maybe (generally) not built to last/be serviced like they used to be.Precisely. For example, if you go to the Fractal Forum a lot of the same kinds of questions are asked
over and over again. There is a bit of Groundhog Day happening.
I just wonder how much of this do we force on the developers.
are we going to demand that the device designers overcome? All of it? None of it? Half of it?
There is----in my view---a lot of consumer entitlement that happens in the UI/ease of use debate. The easier we
make things to use the easier we make it for people to expect everything to be easier to use.
The Great Dumbing Down is upon us.
That's problematic, not just for designers and developers, and teachers and parents.... but for culture and
civilization as an whole, if you ask me.
If that sounds like it came from an old-ish guy it totally did.
Beginner / average consumer < enthusiast < professional
Ease of use (low complexity) < multitude of specialized features to tackle unique and complex use cases (@JiveTurkey)
All products don't need to (and shouldn't) try to cater to everyone.
They add profiling and corner the market.
Yep. Anyone who has ever developed anything, ever, will quickly realize the truth of this... A lot of incoming ideas are often great for the one person requesting the feature/update but may very well break the system/work flow for most everyone else depending on the system and complexity of the flow.I think this is important. Not everyone's feedback as an end user is valid. Just don't tell them that.
