Lysander
Shredder
- Messages
- 2,129
It’s got a full range setting. Probably still running through DSP though.
I had a PC 112 which i ran exclusively in "FRFR" mode. Sounded great.
It’s got a full range setting. Probably still running through DSP though.
Didn't know that. Very cool. Still, the price tag is higher than I'd like. Without the modeling it could be priced as the Fender models.
Probably "the opposite of worse".I like how this thing is simultaneously claimed to be flat and full range while at the same time claimed to have "something" that makes it "better" for guitar than flat.
I don't even need to know what the magical "something" is, just let me know what "better" means
It’s “better” to me, because:I like how this thing is simultaneously claimed to be flat and full range while at the same time claimed to have "something" that makes it "better" for guitar than flat.
I don't even need to know what the magical "something" is, just let me know what "better" means
As baba said, it sounds (feels?) more like a traditional cab than other ""FRFR"" systems I've tried. I'm not sure why that is. I suppose it could be tied to the EQ curve but that doesn't make sense to me as that characteristic remains even when I adjust the onboard knobs. I'd guess it has something to do with the way the actual cabinet resonates whether that's the wood, the shape, both, or something else about it. Regardless, the damn things just sound good. Really good.I like how this thing is simultaneously claimed to be flat and full range while at the same time claimed to have "something" that makes it "better" for guitar than flat.
I don't even need to know what the magical "something" is, just let me know what "better" means
I think someone said its not concentric. On the other hand, once I'm like 6 feet away from a divorced woofer/tweeter, they don't really sound so much different to me than concentricIt’s “better” to me, because:
1. It’s not as directional (somehow), as other solutions are.
In what way would that be good? Or what does this mean? If it changes the frequency response, it may be better sometimes but would be worse at other times. What does a conventional guitar cab sound like? If you have an impulse of that cab, this would then make it sound LESS like a conventional cab2. It sounds closer to a conventional guitar cab than other solutions do, especially the plastic ones.
That's a big plus3. It’s light.
That's an even better plus4. It’s priced at a lower point, than a lot of other solutions, that are pretty good, but don’t sound as good, IMO.
I really don't understand how this would work. Like is it closer in frequency? Directivity? Dynamics?I guess some of us got a little too wrapped up in the REAL ""FRFR"", when what some of us really wanted, was something that sounded more like a conventional amp, in the first place.
He already had me at cheap and light!As baba said, it sounds (feels?) more like a traditional cab than other """FRFR""" systems I've tried. I'm not sure why that is. I suppose it could be tied to the EQ curve but that doesn't make sense to me as that characteristic remains even when I adjust the onboard knobs. I'd guess it has something to do with the way the actual cabinet resonates whether that's the wood, the shape, both, or something else about it. Regardless, the damn things just sound good. Really good.
IMO
I don't even need to know what the magical "something" is, just let me know what "better" means
It's not like we're just guessing here. WKSmith posted some response charts on the fractal forum.I'm really hoping you guys are wrong about the FR12 and that it is just pretty much flat and doesn't do anything weird to the sound unexpectedly, it seems like the perfect cab if so. How loud is it compared to the Powercab?
Probably the opposite of FR.Probably "the opposite of worse".
How does it do with "pretending" to be an open-back Fender, 1x12, then a closed-back 4x12, etc.? I know you can't get something from nothing, but is it capable of representing cab sims "upstream" - at least better than a conventional 1x12?As baba said, it sounds (feels?) more like a traditional cab than other """FRFR""" systems I've tried. I'm not sure why that is. I suppose it could be tied to the EQ curve but that doesn't make sense to me as that characteristic remains even when I adjust the onboard knobs. I'd guess it has something to do with the way the actual cabinet resonates whether that's the wood, the shape, both, or something else about it. Regardless, the damn things just sound good. Really good.
IMO
I the 10 apparently sounds very close to the 12 (I've personally only tried the 12) but is smaller and less expensive. There are people who've had both and then preferred one or the other.So far it looks like the 10" version is better overall, right?
It's definitely better if you're hungry enough to eat $100 worth of pizza. Or if, like @MTB1973, you live in a shoebox.So far it looks like the 10" version is better overall, right?
Still sounded great with my Hydrasynth Explorer even with knobs at noon. Sounded maybe even a tiny bit better with a slight boost to the mid knob.How does it do with "pretending" to be an open-back Fender, 1x12, then a closed-back 4x12, etc.? I know you can't get something from nothing, but is it capable of representing cab sims "upstream" - at least better than a conventional 1x12?
I'm mostly interested in being able to throw synths/ samples at it in between (or sometimes layered with) the amp sims.
EDIT: LOL @deadpool_25 we sorta crossed in the mail on this one.