- Messages
- 3,604
Which is exactly why I think it won't happen.AI Machine Learning is currently all the rage.
Which is exactly why I think it won't happen.AI Machine Learning is currently all the rage.
Line 6's stance on profiling
In real life each 12ax7 or 12at7 or...on and on can sound different. In some amp circuits not as much as others but in some it is night and day. Recently I had been a bit disappointed with my Matchless HC30, was swapping preamp and power tubes and nothing was bringing the joy this amp is...thegearforum.com
Which is exactly why I think it won't happen.
I've only read it again and again that L6 doesn't bend for the current trend. Caps are new and exciting but aren't tablestakes, at least not yet - same as IRs. They'll want to do it "their way" and not just port the feature because it's the flavor of the week.How's that?
I mean, it's really pretty much just as IRs. Profiling is an expansion of IRs.
I've only read it again and again that L6 doesn't bend for the current trend. Caps are new and exciting but aren't tablestakes, at least not yet - same as IRs. They'll want to do it "their way" and not just port the feature because it's the flavor of the week.
Personally, I think that with the release of the ToneX pedal, captures have now become table stakes for any new Line 6 modellers, but not for existing ones.Caps are new and exciting but aren't tablestakes, at least not yet
Personally, I think that with the release of the ToneX pedal, captures have now become table stakes for any new Line 6 modellers, but not for existing ones.
I genuinely can't see that happening - there are an awful lot of HX devices out there, and plenty available on the used market, so I very much doubt Line 6 would see much of "boost" in sales if they updated the current product line to support captures.But then, they could as well just decide to boost their sales of existing hardware - which a capturing feature defenitely would be good for.
I mean, it's really pretty much just as with IRs. Profiling is an expansion of IRs.
I agree - a hybrid solution, dare I say it, like the QC, is the best approach!In the end; component based modeling>>>capture tech anyway. Great option to have certainly but Tone-X has not changed my opinion on that at all.
Ummm, no. They work very different under the hood.
I agree - a hybrid solution, dare I say it, like the QC, is the best approach!
I agree - a hybrid solution, dare I say it, like the QC, is the best approach!
Tone-matched IRTMWhich makes it a bit more sophisticated than just tweaking a T/M/B/P tone stack, but probably nothing you couldn't do, for example, with an EQ that has lots of bands available, and/or can apply multiple instances of parametric boost/cut.
It is right now, but there's always the lurking opinion:pretty much the entire modeling world is all up in furor
So who knows? Track record has proven that L6 doesn't rush to accommodate the flavor of the week, and having mad respect for Christoph Kemper, aren't itching to encroach on his product.In the end; component based modeling>>>capture tech anyway. Great option to have certainly but Tone-X has not changed my opinion on that at all.
Beeta?You can see who lived thru VHS vs Beta and who would still be digging in their heels for beta