Keaton has just gotten better as he's gotten older. He was great in that flick about Oxy!Glad you dig it. I love crime flicks. Really in all sub-forms. Whether they are big dumb exploding things or small quiet dramas with a crime undercurrent. Michael Keaton has always been one of my faves so even if the movie sucked; his presence would still make it enjoyable.
Honestly; I've dug pretty much everything of his since seeing him in Night Shift wayyyyyyyyyy back.Keaton has just gotten better as he's gotten older. He was great in that flick about Oxy!
"220 221, whatever it takes."Honestly; I've dug pretty much everything of his since seeing him in Night Shift wayyyyyyyyyy back.
Nude boobs don't need a reason to exist and calling them gratuitous or insinuating they ruin a film is a weird take. They are boobs and a nice bonus to look at.
I just hope he doesn’t bomb in the Beetlejuice sequel.Keaton has just gotten better as he's gotten older. He was great in that flick about Oxy!
Nude boobs don't need a reason to exist and calling them gratuitous or insinuating they ruin a film is a weird take. They are boobs and a nice bonus to look at.
You're reminding me of a pattern my wife and I have found in films: if you see tits in the first ten minutes, the film is going to suck. It's always a gimmick by a hack director to get you interested in the movie when the writing, directing, and acting have nothing else to offer. Tits later on in a film are hit or miss, but usually still a bad sign; they rarely have to do with a story, and if they do, it's often bad writing haha.
Now, I enjoy tits as much as the next guy, but in the context of movies, they're usually just a distraction.
How dare you disparage the entire Cannon Films catalog like that!You're reminding me of a pattern my wife and I have found in films: if you see tits in the first ten minutes, the film is going to suck. It's always a gimmick by a hack director to get you interested in the movie when the writing, directing, and acting have nothing else to offer. Tits later on in a film are hit or miss, but usually still a bad sign; they rarely have to do with a story, and if they do, it's often bad writing haha.
Now, I enjoy tits as much as the next guy, but in the context of movies, they're usually just a distraction.
The excess nudity trick has 1000% moved over to TV series. There are certainly times where sex makes sense in a story but just shoehorning the shit in there to get eyes on your show is lazy with a capital L.
One of the drawbacks of binge-watching a show multiple times is that you start to pick up on things, such as repetitive dialogue.
So I’m still in the midst of re-watching Lost and noticed that they say the word “what” a lot. Like A LOT! So as what most people would do, I did a quick search and came across this:
@DrewJD82 have you seen this?
One of the drawbacks of binge-watching a show multiple times is that you start to pick up on things, such as repetitive dialogue.
So I’m still in the midst of re-watching Lost and noticed that they say the word “what” a lot. Like A LOT! So as what most people would do, I did a quick search and came across this:
@DrewJD82 have you seen this?
Cannon Films/Golan-Globus have a lot of great films.How dare you disparage the entire Cannon Films catalog like that
Here’s another couple of good ones:Hahahahha to be fair, they were often experiencing/saying crazy shit to each other in pretty much every episode.
I mean, "We ran into a polar bear and then a smoke monster ate Mr. Edo"
What I love about re-watching that show is catching all the stuff that would only make sense the 2nd or 3rd time around, particularly with the Man In Black/Jacob.
This describes so much science fiction. Amazing ideas; embarrassingly clumsy prose.I forgot to mention Javier Bardem was actually the best part. His acting, as always, is the very best.
Frank Herbert meant for Dune to be a messiah story, to lay the basis to talk about how messiahs are bad for your health, as he put it. They even hint in Dune Part One how the messiah story the Fremen believe is an artificial story implanted by the Bene Gesserit centuries prior, which the Bene Gesserit were then working in the shadows to make a reality to fulfill their own political and philosophical ambitions. The whole thing is Herbert's commentary on power, that religion is a tool of power wrangled by politicians for their own ends. That's my understanding, anyway. I started rereading the book recently, and I was shocked at how poorly written I thought it was. I think his ideas are very cool, and the style of throwing in ancient scripture and literary sources in his imaginery universe are awesome, and the fact that he created such a rich world, but the mechanics of his writing were kind of shocking to me. I still want to finish at least the first book again. It's been decades since I first read it. I read the whole original series in sixth grade, so it's been a while haha.
I remember two things about this movie: the opening scene (obvs), and the aspiring author being rejected on the basis of having written a “non-book”.I liked Betty Blue from the opening scene on.
View attachment 21744
One of the drawbacks of binge-watching a show multiple times is that you start to pick up on things, such as repetitive dialogue.
So I’m still in the midst of re-watching Lost and noticed that they say the word “what” a lot. Like A LOT! So as what most people would do, I did a quick search and came across this:
@DrewJD82 have you seen this?
Exactly.Every year has its annoyingly “fashionable” verbiage