Do we think it's a "bug" or just realizing it doesn't sound right. Regardless, glad to see the response!
Maybe not but I can see from the sound that it has similarities to the early helix engine as far as tones on the high gain stuff at least to my ears that was a fair comparison
Okay Jon, next the JCM800, now that they got your attention maybe the TMP will add up to something.
STIR THE POPPIES!!!Haha maybe I won't do another one too soon... I don't want to stir up too much poppies. Perhaps somebody else will? :) I will say though, the JCM800 didn't sound right to me... playing palm mutes on the low e string gave me super weird phasey crossover distortion or something.
AlwaysTMSTIR THE POPPIES!!!
STIR THE POPPIES!!!
Stirring up too many poppies is illegal in some countries!!STIR THE POPPIES!!!
They don't just have the reference amp, they have the design team who built the reference amp.I think it's impossible to botch a model this bad, especially when you have the reference amp and plenty of great reactive load boxes.
"bug" my ass.
Oh my...They don't just have the reference amp, they have the design team who built the reference amp.
who wants to quote all the marketing spiel from release about how good their modelling is on that amp specifically?I think it's impossible to botch a model this bad, especially when you have the reference amp and plenty of great reactive load boxes.
"bug" my ass.
Were the beta testers wearing scarves and focusing on the glitch delays instead?who wants to quote all the marketing spiel from release about how good their modelling is on that amp specifically?
what is it with companies using beta testers who are more like secret forum cheerleaders than ones who actually test if stuff sounds correct?
Its not the first time its happened, I think every modeller has had something slip through the net at some point. But obviously when its a brand new product out of the gate with big claims, and its an "in house brand" that should have been spotted pretty quick.