When I hit my deer, the parts and labor estimate added up to about 95% of the 'totalled' value.
I ran into 2 problems with the estimate: This fucking douchebag of a mechanic had told the adjuster he could straighten the forks, and re-shape the fairing sub-frame. I was like, "NO FUCKING WAY DUDE! You DON'T bend metal back into shape; It fatigues the metal."
The only thing the adjuster would say was, "Well, we're going with the mechanic's recommendations, at which point he'll do the repairs, test-ride the bike, and then if he feels any of the parts aren't performing correctly, we'll then pay to have those parts replaced as well."
I wasn't having any of it, because I knew the bike would be fine at the test speeds it would see, but may not have survived what I wanted to do with the bike, which at the time was to take that bitch out and run it as fast as it would possibly go, just once, to set my own personal land speed record. (Which I did end up doing later on, at 155 mph. But that's another story.)
So we were at odds, and he offered me the full estimate of the parts, plus the shop labor at half their rate, and said I could take that money and fix it myself. So that's what I did. And I had enough money to buy new forks/triple clamps, and the sub-frame.
My understanding is, unless you have gap insurance, you're gonna be shelling out to replace your vehicle. And knowing how insurance companies operate, you may still have to shell out money.
The only time I ever scored against an insurance company was when I bought that bike. I shopped insurance before I bought it, because it was probably going to be expensive..., insuring a >100 Hp sport bike for a 24 year-old. The quote came back within my comfort zone, so I bought it. But when the bill came, it was double what they'd quoted me!!
After arguing with the insurance company, someone told me to write a letter to the Insurance Commission. I did, and they settled it in my favor.