yeky83
Roadie
- Messages
- 979
Mm… then it makes me doubt your previous statement:Either that or too expensive. Same thing here.
Personally, I am happily spending a premium on excellent stuff.
Mm… then it makes me doubt your previous statement:Either that or too expensive. Same thing here.
Personally, I am happily spending a premium on excellent stuff.
They’d have to allow stereo amps in my dream stereo-Player unit. I think Kemper FX are worthwhile, I like ‘em.
Mm… then it makes me doubt your previous statement:
I just want my fantasy pedalboard of Chroma Console + Kemper Player to work! would be a nice little aesthetic pairing of fun pedal + core-tone pedal, but alas… Chroma Console in mono seems a waste.Well, guess you'd have to look elsewhere then. I.mean, they won't allow this unit to do dual amps as long as the flagships don't.
Fwiw, I think the Kemper FX are nice, but on this limited device, stereo ins IMO would be a waste.
I just want my fantasy pedalboard of Chroma Console + Kemper Player to work! would be a nice little aesthetic pairing of fun pedal + core-tone pedal, but alas… Chroma Console in mono seems a waste.
It's a not an good idea to charge extra for updates to this device if you ask me, IF that is what Kemper actually intends to do in the future. Charging for feature enhancements puts Kemper hardware products into a totally different category IMO.
Laughs in HX One and TONEX Pedal.For a display UI on the device to comfortably access the large number of parameters, we would have had to scrap nearly all controls on the surface, leaving merely the Gain and Master Volume and something. This was not what we wanted, knowing that many users prefer to edit sounds using a comfortable remote app anyway.
Christoph Kemper responded in the Kemper forum to this comment:
“We would charge for rising the Player to a different level. And it would be one different level only, lifting it into a different product category. Free of hazzle.
But this would not cut the Player off from the free feature updates that we have pioneered back in 1998 (Access Virus Synthesizers)
There is free feature updates in the works where both levels would benefit.“
- Christoph Kemper
I gathered that the proposed user install of stuff (120/240 V power amp Module) which takes power direct from the wall is a big no no in many jurisdictions due to electrical safety certification laws. Why would he lie? The hole in the back was there from Day 1.That too. As if people were applauding Tesla...
But especially the nonsense about "we couldn't make the poweramp an update because of blahblah..." is just utter BS. There's no technical reason for that.
Thanks g*d for no screen.
I gathered that the proposed user install of stuff (120/240 V power amp Module) which takes power direct from the wall is a big no no in many jurisdictions due to electrical safety certification laws. Why would he lie? The hole in the back was there from Day 1.
If you’re going to use 20 different profiles on this thing you’re likely integrating with a midi switcher that has a screen already
Am I correct in thinking the Camplifier takes its inputs from the KPA outputs and has separate power supply - so two power leads to the unit with the Camplifier installed?So how comes this works for the Camplifier?
You don't know, you just assume your instinct is correct. You have been wrong about a few other things so far, why not show some grace and civility until you find out? And if then you are proven correct have at it...if wrong then you save yourself, and the conversation, from unnecessary agitation.@Antipodes, it's all a matter of design. You can slap a poweramp into a rack without having a degree in electronics. You can even slap a poweramp into DIY active speaker kits. So no, I don't buy that "required certificates worked against us" thing. They could make more money as is, so that's what they did. All fine with me, but they shouldn't tell me nonsense.