Ed DeGenaro
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,172
No, and it has a 1/3 of the fx if the big brother.“The stompbox is Kemper's most affordable profiler yet.”
Oh, so it DOES profile?
That said this has me considering a used stage.
No, and it has a 1/3 of the fx if the big brother.“The stompbox is Kemper's most affordable profiler yet.”
Oh, so it DOES profile?
I wouldn't want an FM0 to arbitrarily limit the types of reverb, delay, OD, etc., algorithms you can use.Isn't this the equivalent to a toaster that an FM0 would be to an Axe?
Kind of like a compact greatest hits that's easy to carry?
yeah reading the manual and noticing that , there is like 2 BOSS chorus, 4 drive boxes, 3 delay types and 3 verbs some of the fx are legacy delay and verb to so you are getting like 12 year old algorithms, which is ok if they are great , but still , reading the specs its does seems like many of the features and power of the flagships have been removedNo, and it has a 1/3 of the fx if the big brother.
That said this has me considering a used stage.
$700...yikes....stereo effects loop?I assume everyone’s seen the Music Radar article?
![]()
Kemper Profiler Player confirmed: "The little green beast premium pedal"
The stompbox is Kemper's most affordable profiler yetwww.musicradar.com
what would you have liked to see?disappointed. why did they once again do such a rigid effects placement topology. my nerves.
So hard to say. Kemper has a Kemper tone to all their profiles, but same could be said for any digital device. I think they all impart some sonic footprint.If I thought ToneX sounded like poop but the Fractal and Iridium both sound phenomenal, is it safe to assume (besides that my ears are bleeding and broke ) that I wouldn’t like Kemper either?
Is it a capture vs modeling thing?
I wouldn't mind if the meat and potatoes is all there. I can understand dropping e.g some of the most demanding fx (which are not meat and potatoes stuff) if compact form factor means using a cheaper DSP as well.I wouldn't want an FM0 to arbitrarily limit the types of reverb, delay, OD, etc., algorithms you can use.
The difference might be just what captures/profiles you use. There's a lot of poop out there to wade through. It's basically the same thing as IRs - people find a vendor whose "sound" they prefer and stick with those.If I thought ToneX sounded like poop but the Fractal and Iridium both sound phenomenal, is it safe to assume (besides that my ears are bleeding and broke ) that I wouldn’t like Kemper either?
Is it a capture vs modeling thing?
I would take smaller footprint FM0 even if limited to FAS amps only or something + a decent effects lists (and no hi-res reverbs). No limitations ideally but wouldn’t mind a few. I am really interested in the form factorI wouldn't mind if the meat and potatoes is all there. I can understand dropping e.g some of the most demanding fx (which are not meat and potatoes stuff) if compact form factor means using a cheaper DSP as well.
The compact stuff is in a weird place because people want it to be cheaper because it's smaller and has less footswitches, when it doesn't really need to be that. I'd gladly take a FM9 in a FM3 format and pay for it.
Kemper Player also sits in that a bit weird area where it's physically not the smallest, is not that cheap and does less than the HX Stomp for example. But I find the user interface preferable just because there's more dedicated knobs and buttons.
Another size comparison:
View attachment 16104
If you chopped off the FM3 footswitches and their displays (and shrunk the main PCB a bit...), you'd end up with a FM0 that is somewhere between the QC and HX Stomp/GT-1000 Core in size.
My un-expressed point was more that it feels like Kemper nerfed the available effects in this thing just to nerf them -- the OG Kemper is not a powerful processor so I kinda find it hard to believe this thing is unable to run the algorithms they decided to leave out of this device.I wouldn't mind if the meat and potatoes is all there. I can understand dropping e.g some of the most demanding fx (which are not meat and potatoes stuff) if compact form factor means using a cheaper DSP as well.
The compact stuff is in a weird place because people want it to be cheaper because it's smaller and has less footswitches, when it doesn't really need to be that. I'd gladly take a FM9 in a FM3 format and pay for it.
Kemper Player also sits in that a bit weird area where it's physically not the smallest, is not that cheap and does less than the HX Stomp for example. But I find the user interface preferable just because there's more dedicated knobs and buttons.
Another size comparison:
View attachment 16104
If you chopped off the FM3 footswitches and their displays (and shrunk the main PCB a bit...), you'd end up with a FM0 that is somewhere between the QC and HX Stomp/GT-1000 Core in size.
That's market segmentation for you. Maybe it allowed them to use a processor that is just that little bit cheaper, won't know how much it shares with the bigger units until someone cracks it open. It's still pretty cool that there's a significant chunk of the big units' features, including wireless editing support.My un-expressed point was more that it feels like Kemper nerfed the available effects in this thing just to nerf them -- the OG Kemper is not a powerful processor so I kinda find it hard to believe this thing is unable to run the algorithms they decided to leave out of this device.
That is surprisingly heavy. My BluGuitar Amp 1 ME is about 1.2 kg / 2.65 lbs and it's a much bigger unit with a full blown poweramp and everything. Fractal FM3/9 and FC6/12 are basically designed as "where you put it, it stays" devices so there's at least some point to the weight.Re: size, my experience with Kemper rack and head was that they are lighter than one would expect, but this thing is like 2.5 pounds which seems surprisingly heavy to me -- maybe the wifi/bluetooth add a decent chunk of weight. For reference, Stomp which has always felt like a bit of a chunky monkey is only 1.75 pounds. FM3 is a beast at 7 pounds.
I've noticed the liquid profile tonestacks do help remedy that kemper sound a bit. Experimenting with applying different tonestacks on old profiles actually makes quite a difference, even if you aren't able to set the dials to what was used during the profiling stage.So hard to say. Kemper has a Kemper tone to all their profiles, but same could be said for any digital device. I think they all impart some sonic footprint.
I ordered from Andertons at £649 yesterday, but I got a call from them this morning to say that this was placeholder pricing and the actual price is £619, so they've refunded me £30.ahhhh yes, that'd make sense.
Paging @JiveTurkey?But which one would you rather put on your pedalboard?