deathbyguitar
Roadie
- Messages
- 158
Unless it's a bass ampWell...one thing seems certain. If any company models really any piece of gear missing in he the Fractal universe, it will likely show up pretty quickly.
Unless it's a bass ampWell...one thing seems certain. If any company models really any piece of gear missing in he the Fractal universe, it will likely show up pretty quickly.
With all due respect that's total BS. I have the axe 3 and the feeebacker is routinely talked about as the missing feature in the fractal forums. Those crocks with the synth don't sound very convincing while the one in the helix is glorious. I wish it wasn't the case but at the moment the axe has no response to line6, I even dug the HX effects out of drawer to connect it to my Axe exactly for that reason.He did, but he was doing that on principal basically suggesting that you can roll your own in a Fractal easily. Same with the Feedbacker, if you want one it's not hard to program it using the synth or pitch block.
I can't believe the day has come when @luckymethod has something positive to say about the Helix...Those crocks with the synth don't sound very convincing while the one in the helix is glorious.
I see it as "pedal drive can do different things than amp drive". While I prefer amp drive in general, something like a fuzz or console preamp style pedal like the Hudson Broadcast into a clean amp can be its own, nice and juicy thing.RE: amp versus pedal distortion.
I think amp distortion can live by itself. You don't need pedal distortion. But in my humble opinion, a distorted pedal into a pure clean amp sounds bollockless most of the time.
However, a crunchy pedal into a crunchy amp? Epic.
I've just never been satisfied getting 100% of my distortion from a pedal. But getting some extra OD character or using one to shape the front of an already distorted amp, it is pretty epic.
How many times can I use the word epic in this post? Epic.
Ahh No for sure a OD block is required for certain types of setups as mentioned Fuzz, OD into a EOB type ampI thought @Stone was suggesting that with the boost section of the amp block there was no need for a separate OD block
Crap. I've been poking around a bit more, and the FM9 appears to add +18.0 dBFS when you send a signal to it via USB and then bring it right back into the DAW (no blocks except input and output, with everything zero'd and the noise gate disabled). I.e., if you send it a -38 dBFS signal, it will come back into the DAW at -20 dBFS. Weird.I can't remember my span settings, I will share when I'm home.
Also, my sweep is 10 to 22k, so the 20-20k range is flatter in span.
Oh man, if only you could try the new 2203 too. It's even better than that feedbacker.With all due respect that's total BS. I have the axe 3 and the feeebacker is routinely talked about as the missing feature in the fractal forums. Those crocks with the synth don't sound very convincing while the one in the helix is glorious. I wish it wasn't the case but at the moment the axe has no response to line6, I even dug the HX effects out of drawer to connect it to my Axe exactly for that reason.
A)You quoted the wrong post. B)Your graph looks weird here, the hump freq is wrong, is it the slope thing you mentioned? C) CC’s graphs are in log scale, dunno where you see linear.Hmmm, interesting. It definitely doesn't appear to be Helix Native, because this is Helix's Klon with "everything at noon," with a full sine sweep from 20 to 20kHz. Looks pretty clean. (The shape is different than Cliff's plots because the freq scale here is logarithmic, while his was linear):
View attachment 14140
HX Klon’s no hump flat bottom-to-mids looks weird to me…? Looking at circuit analysis pages, I wouldn’t expect that…Crap. I've been poking around a bit more, and the FM9 appears to add +18.0 dBFS when you send a signal to it via USB and then bring it right back into the DAW (no blocks except input and output, with everything zero'd and the noise gate disabled). I.e., if you send it a -38 dBFS signal, it will come back into the DAW at -20 dBFS. Weird.
I confirmed it's happening at the FM9's input block, because if you put two output blocks in serial, both of them have the same level.
No idea why it's doing that, but after realizing this and adjusting -18.0dB at the FM9's input block so that the FM9 Klon is now seeing the same input level as Native's Klon, this is how they stack up. There's still some gain differences between the two for an equal input, but the shape is a lot closer.
View attachment 14160
View attachment 14159
View attachment 14161
ODR-1 the other green pedal, AKA as the Nashville/Country OD
Meh...we all hear things differently I guess. The synth implementation sounds fantastic to me on single note lines, obviously on chords the Line 6/DigiTech method excels. Perhaps I'll shoot a head to head tomorrowWith all due respect that's total BS. I have the axe 3 and the feeebacker is routinely talked about as the missing feature in the fractal forums. Those crocks with the synth don't sound very convincing while the one in the helix is glorious. I wish it wasn't the case but at the moment the axe has no response to line6, I even dug the HX effects out of drawer to connect it to my Axe exactly for that reason.
Felt like a Centaury.Feedbacker incoming! :)
Although didn't Cliff resist adding a Klon for about a century or two?
Same with SPDIF.Crap. I've been poking around a bit more, and the FM9 appears to add +18.0 dBFS when you send a signal to it via USB and then bring it right back into the DAW (no blocks except input and output, with everything zero'd and the noise gate disabled). I.e., if you send it a -38 dBFS signal, it will come back into the DAW at -20 dBFS. Weird.
Personally, I never understood the amount of hype some pedals get, including this one.
A) Just sloppy replying on my part. Was responding to that person and what they said, but still talking about the original post at the start of this thread. My goal here was just to see if Cliff’s comparison device was the HX or something else.A)You quoted the wrong post. B)Your graph looks weird here, the hump freq is wrong, is it the slope thing you mentioned? C) CC’s graphs are in log scale, dunno where you see linear.
The plots in my last reply I think are correct for both (within the limitations of the free version of SPAN, an FFT analyzer, vs. the more sophisticated TrueRTA software that Cliff uses). Running the sine sweep through each with the Klon blocks disabled gave a flat line of equal magnitude. Engaging the Klons gave the traces seen on the plots. I normally don’t use SPAN and am only just getting familiar with it, so it’s possible something about my settings was still wonky though. :)HX Klon’s no hump flat bottom-to-mids looks weird to me…? Looking at circuit analysis pages, I wouldn’t expect that…