I can't really pick a preference, for amp tones. They're both really good tbh.
QC is a joy to use. Axe3 needs the editor. Is actually quite hateful to use the front panel.
I'm working on a review video.
I agree with what Orvillian had said too about the tones
There is something very visceral in the QC there is a snarl to its mids and a bite that really reminds me of a tube amp I can’t explain it just fun to play , also the attack and low end response is just very pleasing to a Heavy rock player or metal guys , it immediate
I hear it in their captures to compared to the Kemper
I can't really pick a preference, for amp tones. They're both really good tbh.
QC is a joy to use. Axe3 needs the editor. Is actually quite hateful to use the front panel.
I'm working on a review video.
I do yeah, within a window. I've got the Axe3, and simple things like even naming a preset when you save it... much more fiddly than Helix and QC. That's just one example where working with the thing from the front panel just doesn't satisfy.Do you feel that way about Axe3 even on a patch you've set up beforehand? I'm a FM9 guy, but I find that the difficulty curve starts to flatten when I'm just tweaking existing patches. And honestly, I use factory and Leon Tood ones probably 95 percent of the time.
I do keep a couple of the Gift of Tone ones for bass in case I need to lay an impromptu track down during a session (Fractal bass offerings are complete poo compared to what QC offers, honestly). But otherwise, I'm good using the FM9 hardware on existing patches unless of course I want to use a block from the library that you can't access on device....
CKGBKemper blows goats. I have proof.
I think the QC really excels on the hard rock tones and metal stuffI was listening to some videos with QC vs Kemper captures and you can just hear the Kemper ones sound a lot duller. I really liked a lot of clean to mid gain Kemper stuff but higher gain just didn't have the same bite and tightness as say Fractal amp models.
Yeah totally. I think it's shades of difference.
There's some times where QC sounds a little smoother in a good way, and then I have to do less work to get rid of the extended high frequencies. Then there are other times where Fractal sounds more detailed and clean in a good way, and QC sounds a little stuffy.
I think the QC really excels on the hard rock tones and metal stuff
For the cleaner and EOB more dynamic stuff I would still likely give the edge to FAS
Although the fact they are redoing the Fender Deluxes next update may indicate that they are aware this is one area to address
Along with the spring verb
12 > 8
This is triggering
Because the one on the left is pretty much permanently assimilated by the studio set up. With just the one, there were over a dozen cables and dongles hanging off the back of it, and deciding to use it anywhere else (e.g. band practice at a friend's or whatever) was an ordeal. I wanted a studio interface and something for live/ mobile applications, that could use the very same presets, etc. and not present a big learning curve.I'm sure you've explained it previously, but, uh...why two of the same?
I dipped my toes with the FM3, and for me there was no comparison. The QC just makes sense to me. But I get why some people go the FAS route instead. The amp models are incredible, params are deep, and the unit is a bit quieter overall.This is triggering
In my case the “Fractal thing or the Neural thing again?”
Because the one on the left is pretty much permanently assimilated by the studio set up. With just the one, there were over a dozen cables and dongles hanging off the back of it, and deciding to use it anywhere else (e.g. band practice at a friend's or whatever) was an ordeal. I wanted a studio interface and something for live/ mobile applications, that could use the very same presets, etc. and not present a big learning curve.
Wait!?! Two of the fuckers?!
Yeah, if you keep the studio stuff 100% in the box, the whole proposition changes. I did consider simply buying an audio interface instead of another Quad Cortex... but where's the fun in that? (Seriously, though, I decided to go with the 2nd QC because I don't have plugins that are as comprehensive, or that I like as much, as the QC content.)I'm going to slightly disagree with the "one and only one" rule because Helix Native (with a small, cheapo Steinberg interface) does everything your "studio" Quad Cortex does and frees my FM9 to do all of the external studio recording/live gigging it can stand. But yes, it's easier to minimize UIs....