It works great for bass. Tony Levin has been using one for awhile..I don't have time for 200 pages, is QC still persona non grata? Have promises been lived up to? My bass player wants one apparently
57seconds in. He taps scenes.. it doesn't switch to stomp... he taps it again... now it does it.
Fucking hate that shit about the QC.
It probably is but I don’t think any MI touchscreen is going to be a sensitive as an iPhone or galaxy maybe next Gen but I have not seen it yetTouch screen on the QC is perfectly fine..
I mean, clearly not. Unless you're happy to settle for bullshit. Which is your call.Touch screen on the QC is perfectly fine..
This tigga didn't have sweaty fingers. He had the fingers of a 9 year old.that's going to be the same with every touch screen it can happens or a phone if you have sweaty fingers , its like typing sometimes you hit the r next to the t
That video is 2 weeks old.The QC screen was not calibrated as good as it could be in the first 7 months
You may have missed it in your fervour to disagree with me, but I did own one. When it first came out, but yes to be fair, there's been 3 years since then.You seem to be one of very few complaining about it…while not even owning the unit.
It isn't always a case of touch targets. The MCU in these units has to process a lot of control data, and quite often there can be throttling that means interactions with the TUI result in missed events.I'm still fine with the QC screen. I think it worked well enough at release and only needed bigger touch targets for some elements.
I think we need to start by challenging this precept that *any* touchscreen is perfect. My iPad, and the iPhone I’m typing on right now, miss touch events all the time.You seem to be one of very few complaining about it…while not even owning the unit.
2 owners here say it’s fine…lots of QC vids online where the same conclusion can be made.
Idnk if it is as good as an iPad…maybe it doesn’t have to be…maybe it can’t even cause iPads don’t end up on the floor…idnk..all I know that it not once it occurred to me that it wasn’t doing its job and facilitated a smooth workflow. What should be the benchmark? 100/100 taps work?…sure it probably fails that. Never measured it…but id estimate it at 95/100…which is a whole lot better then other audio devices with a screen I also use….and good enough to not block my certain path to being a rockgod.
I’m not aware of any build quality issues either…besides making sure it has proper ground…which I consider an effect of the design choice to use external power supply.
Which, of course, the QC also has.It’s responsive enough for editing but yeah for performing you want a real physical switch
OMG I had to touch the screen twice. Such bullshit! This is fine:I mean, clearly not. Unless you're happy to settle for bullshit. Which is your call.
OMG I had to touch the screen twice. Such bullshit! This is fine:
I don’t know what that’s supposed to mean. Your position seemed to be that “less than perfect” was unacceptable. My point is that perfect or otherwise, it is a significant improvement over the competition in many ways. (And it’s ironic to hear people complain about less than perfect UI after many in the same camp implied it was lazy, spoiled, etc. to suggest improvements in competitors’ UIs.)Do you want some pasta sauce with that straw??