Hotone Ampero II Stomp - Review

laxu

Rock Star
Messages
5,157
Buckle up folks, this is a long one, and only after one evening!

1.jpg


I found a used limited edition red Hotone Ampero 2 Stomp for sale for a fair price, literally right across the street from where I live. I felt that was divine intervention, so of course I had to buy it.

Firmware update​


First update was not smooth sailing. It's a bit unclear from their website what is the latest software version for their editor, and the device itself. Their website support section is a bit annoying to use too.
  1. The editor software compatible with fw 1.0.5 that was on my unit was called "Ampero II Stomp v1.3.0". This is compatible up to fw v1.3.0.
  2. The firmware I needed to install was version 2.0.0, but many pages kept offering 1.3.0 first so I was confused until I downloaded both and checked the release note dates.
  3. There was also a USB Audio Firmware v2.0.1, that apparenly adds sample rate options for the USB audio interface features. It comes with a separate DFU installer app.
  4. Finally there is an "Ampero II" v1.0.3 editor that is compatible with fw v2.0.0.
It is of course not at all obvious that you need to change the entire editor software, especially when they have near identical version numbers, just 1.3.0 vs 1.0.3.

The firmware update process itself was very slow. It took like 10 minutes or more using the "Ampero II Stomp" app. No indicator on device, just a bar and some file size counter on the editor software.

The new "Ampero II" software is better as it has "Check for update" for both the editor itself and the firmware. So I expect future updates will go smoother.

When I finally got the unit upgraded, its UI had also been upgraded to the one you see on the newer Ampero II (why couldn't they just call it "Ampero II Go" or something stupid like that!) and Ampero II Stage.

Sounds​


Amp modeling​


Let's get this out of the way. This will not impress those who are used to the highest tier of amp modeling like Fractal, Helix or QC. There's a bit of the old modeler "caricature" to some of its sounds where it might get too midrangy, bassy or bright too easily unless you go out of your way to fix it.

The amp models themselves can be kinda hit and miss, where I could dial really good sounds out of many models, while others just didn't work for me at all. It's not even a clear distinction between "normal" models and what Hotone calls their "next gen" models, of which there are only few, marked with "HQ" at the end.

The HQ models seem almost like a "demo version" of some Ampero III they might make in the future, or an abandoned project or something when in 3 years there's only a few of the HQ models available, and not even for the most popular amps like Fenders, Marshalls etc. There's a HQ Mesa JP2C and Soldano SLO instead.

Many of the models react to guitar volume knob and picking dynamics in a decent manner where they are fun to play, but there's just not the same "dimension" to many models you find on higher end modelers.

There's separate preamp models of all the amps, but also a single poweramp model with switchable tube types, sag, negative fb and B+ voltage controls.

Hotone has said on Facebook that the Ampero 2 Stomp should get the Tone Catch capture feature in a future update, and I'm hoping that will fix any complaints I would have about the amp models.

As it is, for the price point I think it sounds pretty good nevertheless when you figure out the right amp/cab pairing.

Cabs​


The stock cabs are actually pretty solid. You have a decent range of single mics, and then 4 different multi-mic mixes. Which are a real life-saver, because setting up a dual cab block preset does not work well because of the way the blocks are split into rows.

You basically can't make a one block parallel split, even though you can move the start and end points of the parallel path.

There's a "cab follows amp" feature in the global settings, that matches them automatically when you change amp models, but I could not find a list of what the pairings are.

My advice for the stock cabs is to use any of the mixes as a starting point, then mess with the mic placement dropdown. It works in an intuitive manner even if it's far from the granularity of Fractal, QC or even Helix.

Impulse responses​


You have 50 user slots for impulse responses. That's plenty. You can easily import even multiple IRs using the editor software. Then it will ask which slots you want to assign for each IR, so it doesn't need to be in sequence. It even seemed to convert my 48 KHz IRs just fine, though I haven't tested if this has any effect on quality. In any case, adding IRs is super easy.

However there's one big inconvenience with IRs. Whenever you change them, it defaults all the low/high cut and especially the resolution to normal instead of high. This is pretty annoying so it's best to find your preferred IR, swap it to high res and do your low/high cuts if needed.

Effects​


Most of the effects are actually very good!

There's not a whole ton of reverbs, but the ones that are there are all quite good!

There's plenty of different delays and they sound good as well to my ears, though I haven't explored them in detail yet.

Noise gate is good. It allows sidechain input so you can put the block wherever you want in the chain and still trigger it based on e.g left input. I do wish that as a convenience you could have a basic one in the input block like Fractal does.

There's also a comprehensive pitch section but it ranges from pretty good to absolutely terrible. Unfortunately the "virtual capo" equivalent seems downright broken, where it just warbles in pitch and sounds awful. This is weird because harmonizers, octavers, dual detune and more work fine, track quickly and sound totally alright. It's not Fractal or Helix quality pitch shifting, but totally usable.

Lots of wahs, drives, modulations, filters, and EQs. Compressor options are very few.

There is also the Fx loop block, and separate send and return blocks similar to the Helix. You can also assign inputs and outputs to the fx loop send/return if you want to save blocks.

I need to try more of the effects to truly evaluate them, but generally what I've tried has been anything from alright to good.

DSP limits​


It uses a dual core SHARC + ARM Analog Devices ADSP-21573 DSP chip. Hotone somewhat misleadingly calls it "tri-core" but the actual signal processing is dual core, with ARM for UI etc.

The block limit is 12.

With an amp and cab or IR block, you can fit in a pretty standard guitar signal chain to the 12 slots: Gate - Wah - Comp - Drive - Amp - Cab/IR - EQ - Fx Send - Mod - Fx return - Delay - Reverb.

The reverb is clearly one of the most demanding effects and its options are the first to become limited. The limitation is shown the same as Helix, dimmed models in the list when you try to change them.

Without the amp/cab block, I was able to cram in something like several different stereo delays, two reverbs (with limitations), a pitch block and a bunch of lower CPU usage blocks. So using this as purely an fx unit would work fine, as long as the routing options available are ok for you.

Hardware​


  • USB port location on the side is inconvenient. Would've preferred it in the back.
  • Expression input being the first port from the right is dumb. I plugged my guitar into that at first and wondered why I'm not getting any sound!
  • @timbuck3 will be pleased to know there's a stereo fx loop on the side. It uses TRS jacks for send and return.
  • MIDI DIN in/out are on the other side. It supports MIDI in/out over both USB and MIDI ports and you can choose if it's used for one or both.
  • There's a little lock button on the hardware that prevents you from accidentally turning knobs or tapping the screen. Maybe useful for live?
Basic mapping of the hold functions for the 3 footswitches is spot on: Tuner, Looper and toggle between Preset and Stomp/Scene mode.

I hate only 3 footswitches, but with this one it's generally good enough. Probably hard to fit more in this form factor. I wish Hotone allowed the 5 scenes you can use on the Ampero II Stage though, on the Stomp you can program only 3 and can't do more even with external footswitches or MIDI.

The Ampero II Stage seems like the sweet spot product where you get e.g BT editing/audio/MIDI, a bit larger screen, more I/O and a few extra footswitches/scenes in about the size of a Boss GX-10. Stage's processing capabilities are identical to the Stomp afaik.

Display​


The touchscreen is nice and responsive, I'd say it worked better than the QC I had. Maybe because it's just 4", there's less chance of pressing outside the action areas?

The Ampero 2 and Stage have a 5" screen, which I'd say is spot on for this UI.

Viewing angles are ok. On the desk you mostly have poor black levels when viewing the unit at an angle, but on the floor it looks better. There seems to be no brightness control for the screen.

Font sizes could be larger, as patch name and quick params can be hard to see in the Preset mode. There's two modes for this view where one shows patch bank/number bigger and the other shows patch name bigger. In both cases the smaller text is too small to read unless standing right above the unit.
 

Onboard user interface​

Hey, you don't get a @laxu post without this part!

The old pre-2.0.0 UI was clearer about the meaning of many buttons (just text labels), now they are mostly just icons. It takes a while to figure out what they all mean. Most are self-explanatory, but there are some that you just have to press and see. Understandable, fw 2.0.0 adds things like a metronome/drum machine etc that take space somewhere.

I found the UI easy to figure out without reading the manual, just tried "can I tap and hold this?" type stuff. If you've used a HX Stomp, you'll find this very familiar.

Modes​

  • Preset mode. Footswitches change presets. Press middle + left or right to change banks. There's an option to change banks immediately, or one that asks you to press one of the footswitches to pick a preset from the new bank. This lets you "prime" your next preset.
  • Stomp/scenes mode. Footswitches toggle assigned function. Screen shows current preset/scene and footswitch functions.
  • Edit mode. This is an extension of Stomp/scenes. Footswitches work the same, but you see your signal chain and

Menu/value knob​


The Menu/value knob is not that useful. It can act as a cursor and for param adjustment. Similar experience to the Fractal big knob, except better. To make it change params you click it, then click again to make it a cursor again. Cursor follows the last thing you tapped on screen.

It's probably mostly useful by selecting the preset number on the preset screen and cycling presets.

Preset management​


This is a bit buried, but by holding the preset name you get a list of presets and a little Manage button at the corner.
Press this, and you can move, swap, rename, copy and paste presets right on the unit.

Block management​

  • Adding blocks couldn't be easier. Tap an empty block spot with a + sign.
  • To change the model or type, tap the model name at the bottom.
  • To move, swap, copy, paste or delete, just hold the block to get a menu.
  • Fx select opens a Helix style 3-column list of block type - fx type - fx model.
Could not be much better than this. You can also drag n' drop but its a bit difficult to activate (tap and immediately drag). The move/swap system is actually better on a screen this small.

Routing​

You pick a routing template from the top menu. You can change this at any time and it will rearrange your blocks for you so you don't have to commit to anything.
  • Both cores in series.
  • Separate parallel paths
  • Split -> Mix (typical single parallel loop).
  • A/B -> Y. Dual paths mixed to one out.
  • Y -> A/B. One path sent through two signal chains to separate outs.
  • Output can be set to fx send and input to fx return if you want to save a block.
Basically all the routing options you have seen on a Line6 HX Stomp.

Scene assignments​

  • There's 3 scenes on the Ampero 2 Stomp, 5 on the Stage and "Ampero II".
  • You can't change models in a scene, which is a bit non-intuitive. Only scene 1 allows block operations and model changes.
  • You can change any number of block params in scenes though. I wish there was an indicator for which params deviate from scene 1 though.
  • Bypass states are obviously also something you can toggle.
  • You can't save which scene is the default when loading preset, it's always scene 1.
Setting up scenes is child's play. Just select the scene you want to edit, turn the knobs and turn on/off what you want.

Quick params and footswitch assigns​


  • You can assign the knobs to any single block param when you are in the footswitch view. Similar to what you can do on Boss GT/GX and Fractal Performance view. Except this is super fast and simple to assign. You just hold any of the param slots and then can assign all 3 using a Helix style list of blocks and params.
  • Footswitches can be assigned to specialty functions like scene toggles, tap tempo etc.
  • Footswitches can also be assigned to flip the state of any number of blocks. So you could do e.g a "turn off reverb and turn on delay". The state flip depends on what you have configured in a scene.
  • All quick params and footswitches can be assigned from a single view, without going back to the main view first.
Great execution here.

Changing fx params​


The 3 knobs are not cramped at all. If you flick them with a bit of force they will change more significantly. I think they could be a little bit more responsive though, but good enough for both granular and larger adjustments.

But the cool thing is that you can also use the touchscreen. You can drag the slider on screen, or you can tap and hold the left side to slowly decrease the value, or right side to slowly increase the value. It's surprisingly usable like that.

Hotone has done well with the fx param order. E.g Amp block is Gain/Presence/Master - Bass/Mid/Treble and so on. Every effect has the right parameters in the right order so you don't have to go to page 3 to find a freakin' Mix control.

I wish there was a "reset param to default" or "reset param to middle" feature. Even the editor doesn't have one.


Overall, the onboard user interface is very good. It's gone straight to the top of my "favorite complex modeler user interface" list, which was previously occupied by the Quad Cortex. During my time learning it, at no point did I become frustrated with it, or didn't even find the 3 parameters at a time thing to be too annoying.

Editor software​


The computer editor is solid. Anyone used to the Helix editor will be right at home. Except this one scales better and uses knobs instead of sliders.

Mostly the latest "Ampero II" version of the editor software works fine.

Sometimes the knob view can look odd if you don't have the right side window though because it's not fixed but changes based on your window size. For example you might have a single control drop down to another row, but then it goes back when you make the window a bit larger. Basically find a suitable size and it will be ok.

Moving blocks can be done via drag n' drop, but it seems fickle whether it will place a block between others or put them into a particular slot. It could be better. I'd recommend doing this stuff from the touchscreen instead.

I had some issues where params would not adjust on first drag, and managed to get the app to crash once when adjusting a param.

It's pretty easy to use and you can even dual wield by editing one block on your computer and another on the touchscreen!

A great feature on the editor is a small help column next to the blocks. This will tell you e.g what "Mix 1" on a particular cab means, or what a particular cab is based on. I really wish this was a feature on HX-Edit and especially Axe-Edit!

Almost everything you can do on the editor, you can do on the device. The only extra on the editor is uploading IRs to the unit, backup and firmware update features.

Drum machine​


The metronome and drum machine is very basic. A play/pause button, a list of metronome and drum patterns. 100 patterns total. I wish Hotone broke it down to smaller categories instead of one long list.

For controls, just tempo, volume and whether tempo is synced to tap tempo.

The drum loops are short and simple. But that's honestly enough if all you want is to have a bit of drums to jam to. It's a pretty good extra feature as a practice tool, covering multiple genres. A real instant gratification feature.

Looper​


TODO. I haven't tried this yet.

Conclusion and value for money​


For what the Ampero II Stomp costs new, it's just good value for the money.
  • The onboard user interface is better than pretty much every modeler on the market regardless of price.
  • The editor software is almost as good as HX-Edit or Axe-Edit. Just needs more polishing, some convenience features and bug fixes.
  • Its feature set is comparable to e.g a HX Stomp, and helluva lot better than Tonex or Nano Cortex.
In fact I think this is what the HX Stomp could have been if Line6 had been brave enough to use a touchscreen. Hotone have clearly looked at all the competition and tried to pick the best ideas where suitable. HX Stomp, Boss GT-1000 Core and GX-10 seem like the closest competitors. GX-10 remains the value for money king though.

While the Ampero 2's sounds don't quite compete with the top dogs, at $500 / ~450 €, it's hard to find something that as an overall package is as good. I think the Ampero 2 Stomp is the perfect box to recommend to people on a budget who want something compact like this.

The Ampero II Stage has me more on the fence at 200€ more. Mic pre, Bluetooth, more footswitches and balanced XLR outs are maybe worth that, but maybe I would start to consider other products at that price point.

The no-knob "Ampero II" with an expression pedal at 100€ less than Stage is just dumb to me. While the touchscreen works really well, I still like having knobs.

The entire Ampero 2 range can be summed as "more than good enough." In just one evening I was able to program a few presets that I considered good sounding, that I could use without too many complaints. I'll have to see if I feel the same about them tomorrow.
 
Last edited:

Hopes and dreams​


I would love to see Hotone pair all this stuff with a higher power DSP and take on the big boys. All they need is improvement in the sounds, amp modeling in particular.

I'm waiting to try that capture feature, it could be just the thing to elevate this enough even if it's not the best of the best. Since the A2 Stomp doesn't have a mic pre built in like the Stage and "Just II", I wonder if that will maybe limit its capture capabilities or require an audio interface in between for capturing an entire rig with a mic.

The Ampero 2 Stomp has been on the market for about 3 years now, so it's possible there's an Ampero 3 on the horizon, which is a bit annoying about this business model.

Things I'd like to see on a next gen unit:
  • Higher DSP capabilities, even if the max amount of blocks stays the same. Just less "ugh can't add this thing now" limits.
  • Make it a bit wider and add an extra footswitch and encoder with a larger screen.
  • BT capabilities of the Stage.
 
Last edited:
I always enjoy reading a @laxu review. Some really good points in there.

Hotone are easily "the best of the rest" IMO and there's some elements of the Ampero that are done really well, and others that need refining. The time based fx are pretty awesome and the new capture function is solid.
 
@laxu thanks for the detailed review! Re: assigning scenes to footswitches, are the assignments per patch, or per scene. I.e. if I’m in scene 1 and assign scene 2 to FS 1, can I edit scene 2 so that FS 1 takes me back to scene 1? Or are you stuck with FS1 only taking you to scene 2?
 
@laxu thanks for the detailed review! Re: assigning scenes to footswitches, are the assignments per patch, or per scene. I.e. if I’m in scene 1 and assign scene 2 to FS 1, can I edit scene 2 so that FS 1 takes me back to scene 1? Or are you stuck with FS1 only taking you to scene 2?
The assignments are per preset, so you can't change what that footswitch does between scenes. It's limited but good enough.

You don't have to use scenes either, they could be just turning on/off 3 fx blocks for example, or a mix of scene and fx toggles.

Tuner, looper and preset vs stomp/scenes mode hold functions are always available.
 
So how's the ampero is it good or bad?
I'd say great for the money. It's easy to recommend the Ampero 2 range over anything from Headrush, Nux, Mooer, Valeton etc.

It's not a straightforward "just buy this" recommendation because those amp models are hit and miss, some of the fx could be better, there are DSP limitations and footswitching functions are limited.

This is unlikely to sway someone who already owns a Helix/HX Stomp, QC, or current gen Fractal, even if the Hotone form factor and UI is great. Those other products can still do more, with higher quality modeling and fx. But they also cost anything from ~3-5x the Ampero 2 Stomp, so it's hard to separate that part.

What about the rest?
  • Boss GX-10 is cheaper than the Ampero 2 Stomp, with a built in expression pedal so that's a bit of a tough nut.
  • Boss GX-100 is about the same cost as the Ampero 2 Stage. I don't know enough about what the Boss can do to say if it's better, the built-in expression pedal might count. Let's say they are neck and neck.
  • Boss GT-1000? Extra footswitches and expression might again count, plus you can have more fx. UI is miles behind.
  • Boss GT-1000 Core? I like the extra encoders but that's about it. I think the A2 Stomp is strong competition.
  • Kemper Player? I'd rather have the Ampero 2 Stomp or Stage. Too expensive with the upgrades and no screen.
  • Kemper Toaster/Rack/Stage? Definitely a harder choice, but ~3x the cost.
  • Fender TMP? The Ampero UI is less dumbed down and more usability oriented. Soundwise, I expect the TMP comes out on top with its convolution reverbs and the recent amp modeling improvements. But again, over 3x the price of the A2 Stomp...
I think the Ampero 2 Stomp scores high on the fun and value factors. Without noticing it my entire evening went by messing with it, I found some tones that were fun to play with, and didn't get annoyed using it. Maybe that's because it's the new toy, we'll have to see.
 
Trying more amp models, I don't think this models master volume behavior at all. On MV amps the Master just becomes an output level control as for example the JCM800 doesn't get more gainy if you crank the master, just louder. That doesn't mean you can't get good sounds out of those models, but they just won't do what the real deal does.

Non-master volume amps have an Output knob that works as volume control, but I think those do a better job at modeling poweramp drive, where they seem to be have closer to e.g Helix Native. That said the Marshall SLP model seems pretty terrible - weirdly thin, whereas the Marshall 50 model is much better to me.

I'd say it's best to not try to chase absolute accuracy from the models, but just see if you can get sounds that you find fun to play. I think the unit has no problems with that. There's a ton of amp models to try so there's bound to be something that works for anyone when paired with the right cab or user IR.

For other minuses, it has some annoyances like changing models resets all block settings, including scene assignments. It would be nice if there were favorites for the blocks so you could at least easily recall your favorite settings or set them as defaults.

For building presets, I found the best way was to just get all your blocks right before worrying about scenes.
 
Seems the A2 Stomp firmware lags a bit behind the Stage and "Ampero II". Stage got a fw update in July:
  • Global tap tempo
  • MIDI out on footswitch
  • Scene naming
  • Highlighted scene 1 parameters.
  • There's also some vocal pitch correction effects missing, which may not make it since there's no mic pre on the A2 Stomp.
These features came out in July, so maybe I will get a nice Christmas present? I assume these will end up on the A2 Stomp when it gets the Tone Catch update.
 
I think Amperos are good.

However...

Yeah, they seem better than Mooer/Nux/Valeton... But they're much more expensive too. Let's face it, they're not budget units anymore. The stage goes around 650€.

Big advantages are wonderful UI and XLR input for onboard capturing (which, according to Leo Gibson comparison, seems to be top notch).

Disadvantages compared to units in that price range (which are... just he HX stomp? Maybe the HR Core?), seem to be: worse amp models, worse effects?

Personally, I don't like the idea of not too good modelling or effects. At this point, even Headrush, if their SuperClone parametric capturing works good (Taylor Danley liked it), would be comparable (Great UI too, and effects shouldn't be worse, I guess).

What I don't like is that, apparently, We've got not too many multieffects to choose from (I'm referring to truly all in one units, and excluding 3-footswitchers) in that 600-700€ range. What do we have? The Stomp XL (honestly, I hate that "We're never ever going to add capturing" philosophy of L6), the Core, Ampero Stage... What else? GX-100, Zoom G11 or Mooer GE300 are below (both in price and modeling/capturing innovation). It seems the only option is to jump to the 1k (helix, prime) or the 1.5k (kemper, QC) or even more (TMP, FM9).
 
I think Amperos are good.

However...

Yeah, they seem better than Mooer/Nux/Valeton... But they're much more expensive too. Let's face it, they're not budget units anymore. The stage goes around 650€.

Big advantages are wonderful UI and XLR input for onboard capturing (which, according to Leo Gibson comparison, seems to be top notch).

Disadvantages compared to units in that price range (which are... just he HX stomp? Maybe the HR Core?), seem to be: worse amp models, worse effects?

Personally, I don't like the idea of not too good modelling or effects. At this point, even Headrush, if their SuperClone parametric capturing works good (Taylor Danley liked it), would be comparable (Great UI too, and effects shouldn't be worse, I guess).

What I don't like is that, apparently, We've got not too many multieffects to choose from (I'm referring to truly all in one units, and excluding 3-footswitchers) in that 600-700€ range. What do we have? The Stomp XL (honestly, I hate that "We're never ever going to add capturing" philosophy of L6), the Core, Ampero Stage... What else? GX-100, Zoom G11 or Mooer GE300 are below (both in price and modeling/capturing innovation). It seems the only option is to jump to the 1k (helix, prime) or the 1.5k (kemper, QC) or even more (TMP, FM9).
Seems like a Pod Go, GX100, or G11 are direct competitors in price. They all have more switching options and a pedal.

For $500 I would have a hard time choosing the Ampero over any of them. Unless the sound is better. I don't know how you rank the tones, so I'm not sure how you think it compares.

The Ampero is a swiss army knife. The GX100 has the Boss strategy we all know with a sizeable board and pedal. The G11 is the best of the instant gratification boxes like the M90 etc.

In this price range "all in one" is hard to argue against and the Boss, Zoom, and Line6 boxes have more.

The Ampero is more like a pedal board brain pedal, but unlike the GT1000 it only has one loop, not two. Unsure of its midi implementation. Unsure of its latency. In that role I would choose the GT1000 and use the software editor.
 
Excellent review Laxu, I agree with basically everything you said. If you are willing to tweak, I think some of the models can sound quite good.

The Hotone devices regularly go on sale on Amazon. Even if they're not currently on sale, you can go on eBay and message Sonicake, and they will give you a discount.

I got my Stomp for around $350, which makes it an incredibly compelling option.
 
I think Amperos are good.

However...

Yeah, they seem better than Mooer/Nux/Valeton... But they're much more expensive too. Let's face it, they're not budget units anymore. The stage goes around 650€.
The price difference of e.g the Valeton GP-200 to the Hotone Ampero 2 Stomp is about 100 €, so I'd say they are reasonably in the same category. Granted, the Valeton has more footswitches and an expression pedal so that's worth something.

At lower end of the price scale, it's always a question of "do I spend a bit more to buy the compact unit that sounds better, or go for the cheaper bigger unit that has more footswitches and whatnot but might not sound as good". I'd rather have e.g a HX Stomp instead of a Pod Go (which I keep forgetting even exists). Or Ampero 2 Stomp over the POD Express and similar.

The A2 Stage might be more worth its price if you consider it a vocal + guitar processor. It has some vocal effects that are not found on the Stomp so I don't know how good they are. But it has a built in mic pre and I don't think you find that feature on anything cheaper.

Purely for guitar, it's harder to say the Stage features are worth an extra 200 € or so over the A2 Stomp. It's not like a HX Stomp -> Helix LT situation where you also double the DSP for around 260 €.

Big advantages are wonderful UI and XLR input for onboard capturing (which, according to Leo Gibson comparison, seems to be top notch).

Disadvantages compared to units in that price range (which are... just he HX stomp? Maybe the HR Core?), seem to be: worse amp models, worse effects?

Personally, I don't like the idea of not too good modelling or effects.
So far the only effect that truly sucks is the String Shifter, which is supposed to down/uptune your guitar similar to the virtual capo pitch shift on Fractal. That effect seems completely broken, or it's not what the manual says it is. It sounds more like a warbling tremolo pitch shift effect.

The fuzz models sound fine, but don't react to guitar volume knob quite right, they seem like they don't clean up as well as real fuzzes can. Drive models are good.

For amp models, I haven't even tried all of them yet because there's so many, but so far the one I haven't liked has been the "Marshell SLP" (100W Marshall Superlead) model. But I can just ignore that exists and use the "Marshell 50" models that sound just fine.

If anything, I actually have to start putting higher standards on the more expensive units. If a unit this cheap is better to use than literally everything above its price range, comes with a comparable software editor, can run up to 12 fx blocks etc. If its sounds are let's say 80% as good, we are paying a lot for that extra quality and additional features.

Like how is a Nano Cortex worth more than this, with only 4 fx with one type each and only captures? If the A2 Stomp gets captures, that makes the NC value even worse.

PS. Ampero 2 Stomp boot time is around 8 seconds.
 
Last edited:
Many thanks for such a detailed and decent review, @laxu, and while I knew quite some things before already, it's proving that this thing could be worth considering in that price bracket.
Also, my other takeaway would be, that out of "the rest" companies, Hotone actually seems to understand live guitarists. Just to quote this:

There's a little lock button on the hardware that prevents you from accidentally turning knobs or tapping the screen. Maybe useful for live?

Absolutely useful I'd say! Even with the Stomp (where it's just the 3 decoders below the screen), I found myself accidentally touching them with a foot or when just moving the board by a few centimeters.
And really, this is possibly a pretty minor thing for most folks, yet they care about it. For me, that's a very promising thing.
 
The price difference of e.g the Valeton GP-200 to the Hotone Ampero 2 Stomp is about 100 €, so I'd say they are reasonably in the same category. Granted, the Valeton has more footswitches and an expression pedal so that's worth something.

At lower end of the price scale, it's always a question of "do I spend a bit more to buy the compact unit that sounds better, or go for the cheaper bigger unit that has more footswitches and whatnot but might not sound as good". I'd rather have e.g a HX Stomp instead of a Pod Go (which I keep forgetting even exists). Or Ampero 2 Stomp over the POD Express and similar.

The A2 Stage might be more worth its price if you consider it a vocal + guitar processor. It has some vocal effects that are not found on the Stomp so I don't know how good they are. But it has a built in mic pre and I don't think you find that feature on anything cheaper.

Purely for guitar, it's harder to say the Stage features are worth an extra 200 € or so over the A2 Stomp. It's not like a HX Stomp -> Helix LT situation where you also double the DSP for around 260 €.


So far the only effect that truly sucks is the String Shifter, which is supposed to down/uptune your guitar similar to the virtual capo pitch shift on Fractal. That effect seems completely broken, or it's not what the manual says it is. It sounds more like a warbling tremolo pitch shift effect.

The fuzz models sound fine, but don't react to guitar volume knob quite right, they seem like they don't clean up as well as real fuzzes can. Drive models are good.

For amp models, I haven't even tried all of them yet because there's so many, but so far the one I haven't liked has been the "Marshell SLP" (100W Marshall Superlead) model. But I can just ignore that exists and use the "Marshell 50" models that sound just fine.

If anything, I actually have to start putting higher standards on the more expensive units. If a unit this cheap is better to use than literally everything above its price range, comes with a comparable software editor, can run up to 12 fx blocks etc. If its sounds are let's say 80% as good, we are paying a lot for that extra quality and additional features.

Like how is a Nano Cortex worth more than this, with only 4 fx with one type each and only captures? If the A2 Stomp gets captures, that makes the NC value even worse.

PS. Ampero 2 Stomp boot time is around 8 seconds.
I just got the Stage and you're right about the supposed polyphonic pitch shifter. The regular pitch shifter actually sounds decent even for a full step, turning the tone down a bit also helps.
 
The price difference of e.g the Valeton GP-200 to the Hotone Ampero 2 Stomp is about 100 €, so I'd say they are reasonably in the same category. Granted, the Valeton has more footswitches and an expression pedal so that's worth something.

At lower end of the price scale, it's always a question of "do I spend a bit more to buy the compact unit that sounds better, or go for the cheaper bigger unit that has more footswitches and whatnot but might not sound as good". I'd rather have e.g a HX Stomp instead of a Pod Go (which I keep forgetting even exists). Or Ampero 2 Stomp over the POD Express and similar.

The A2 Stage might be more worth its price if you consider it a vocal + guitar processor. It has some vocal effects that are not found on the Stomp so I don't know how good they are. But it has a built in mic pre and I don't think you find that feature on anything cheaper.

Purely for guitar, it's harder to say the Stage features are worth an extra 200 € or so over the A2 Stomp. It's not like a HX Stomp -> Helix LT situation where you also double the DSP for around 260 €.


So far the only effect that truly sucks is the String Shifter, which is supposed to down/uptune your guitar similar to the virtual capo pitch shift on Fractal. That effect seems completely broken, or it's not what the manual says it is. It sounds more like a warbling tremolo pitch shift effect.

The fuzz models sound fine, but don't react to guitar volume knob quite right, they seem like they don't clean up as well as real fuzzes can. Drive models are good.

For amp models, I haven't even tried all of them yet because there's so many, but so far the one I haven't liked has been the "Marshell SLP" (100W Marshall Superlead) model. But I can just ignore that exists and use the "Marshell 50" models that sound just fine.

If anything, I actually have to start putting higher standards on the more expensive units. If a unit this cheap is better to use than literally everything above its price range, comes with a comparable software editor, can run up to 12 fx blocks etc. If its sounds are let's say 80% as good, we are paying a lot for that extra quality and additional features.

Like how is a Nano Cortex worth more than this, with only 4 fx with one type each and only captures? If the A2 Stomp gets captures, that makes the NC value even worse.

PS. Ampero 2 Stomp boot time is around 8 seconds.
I actually asked for just a Tone catch box in the Mini chassis captures , cab , fx no amp models
Hotone replied and said that a nice idea , like it
So we will see , a ToneX like box in the $300-350 would intrest me based on the captures I have heard from Leon and Michael Nielsen
 
Back
Top