JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 18,075
They're no FirehouseTrixter?? That’s a random choice

They're no FirehouseTrixter?? That’s a random choice
Not at all random. Firehouse was also a good shout. CC Deville could have been another. There are some hair metal guitar tones that were aggressive sounding, but most of them just seem like smooth sustain to me, where, to the extent there was any aggression, it came from vocals (see Whitesnake) and the constant "I'm shoving my dick in your face" stage moves.Trixter?? That’s a random choice
If we are having a tepid-off, I think Trixter wins? But its a close race, for sure.They're no Firehouse![]()
I "like" 2 Firehouse songs the .5 Trixter song I "like". Fair estimation.If we are having a tepid-off, I think Trixter wins? But its a close race, for sure.
The Gift of Tone returns!
@metropolis_4 plays Metallica on the fendersCan you get Metallica with a Plexi?
You're just making up your own argument. No-one said "high gain aggressive tone". The initial post you quoted simply said that a boosted plexi could be aggressive. Then you sent us down this historical rabbit hole of nonsense.Plexi with Tubescreamer was 79/80. JCM800 released in 1981. Mesa 2c was 1983. By late 80s everything was modded or rack preamps. SLO100 was 1987. Then 1992 was 5150.
Can you get Metallica with a Plexi? I think only within the confines of a Fractal box. I mean you would expect the 800 to do it better, even sticking a Metal Zone in front. So why would anyone attempt it with a plexi model if there is an 800? Or a 2C?
I was responding to a claim of "high gain aggressive tone". And I took that to mean metallica level of gain. Because whitesnake was rock.
This is the thing with modeling, and I'm not singling out Fractal, but most models can be hammered into something that gets the same result as the other models. But in the real world this isn't possible. They are unrealistic because they don't impose the same limits as the original gear.
To be pedantic, the JCM800 is not an amp model, it's a series name, the amp model that many seem to call the "JCM800" is the 2203/04 that Marshall has sold since like 1976.. :) The JCM800 version is 99% the same amp.. :)Plexi with Tubescreamer was 79/80. JCM800 released in 1981. Mesa 2c was 1983. By late 80s everything was modded or rack preamps. SLO100 was 1987. Then 1992 was 5150.
Can you get Metallica with a Plexi? I think only within the confines of a Fractal box. I mean you would expect the 800 to do it better, even sticking a Metal Zone in front. So why would anyone attempt it with a plexi model if there is an 800? Or a 2C?
I was responding to a claim of "high gain aggressive tone". And I took that to mean metallica level of gain. Because whitesnake was rock.
This is the thing with modeling, and I'm not singling out Fractal, but most models can be hammered into something that gets the same result as the other models. But in the real world this isn't possible. They are unrealistic because they don't impose the same limits as the original gear.
Honestly idk about that. I think it would take a good amount of tinkering and "modding". Even then, I don't think it would sound the same as a 2cp patch.But I think my "unrealistic" argument stands. I bet, if any of you with a Fractal was tasked with getting metallica sounds using the Fractal 1959 plexi, with whatever boosts, amp sims, EQs, IRs are available, you would have no problem getting a sound that was indistinguishable from Metallica 2cp patches.
I still think you should give the FM3 a whirl. If you don't like it, just return itI have no dog in this fight. As soon as they develop a new touch UI I will be on the multi-year waiting list.
Plexi with Tubescreamer was 79/80. JCM800 released in 1981. Mesa 2c was 1983. By late 80s everything was modded or rack preamps. SLO100 was 1987. Then 1992 was 5150.
Can you get Metallica with a Plexi? I think only within the confines of a Fractal box. I mean you would expect the 800 to do it better, even sticking a Metal Zone in front. So why would anyone attempt it with a plexi model if there is an 800? Or a 2C?
I was responding to a claim of "high gain aggressive tone". And I took that to mean metallica level of gain. Because whitesnake was rock.
This is the thing with modeling, and I'm not singling out Fractal, but most models can be hammered into something that gets the same result as the other models. But in the real world this isn't possible. They are unrealistic because they don't impose the same limits as the original gear.
Did you ever try the tone x?Yes, it is top candidate to replace my current mfx, but I'm doing the IR-X thing now. If/when I get bored with that I will get an FM3.
Yes, it is top candidate to replace my current mfx, but I'm doing the IR-X thing now. If/when I get bored with that I will get an FM3. Or maybe the next Helix, or...
How so? As long as you stick to the real world controls and don't dive into the deep parameters, it should be as close to reality as possible. At least with the Fractal stuff that is modeled after real world amps.a problem with all modelers (hardware, software) I have used, which is they don't impose the same limits as real gear.
I never said fake. My argument stems around a problem with all modelers (hardware, software) I have used, which is they don't impose the same limits as real gear.
I am sorry if I waded into a debate I am not qualified for, but the claim of Fractal+Plexi+aggressive set off an alarm. I thought he was talking about metallica style metal with a plexi, which I have no doubt is possible inside the fractal.
“I think the argument I made up out of whole cloth stands because I do”OK, this whole argument hinges on the definition of "aggressive" tone. So it can't go anywhere if we disagree on what was meant.
But I think my "unrealistic" argument stands. I bet, if any of you with a Fractal was tasked with getting metallica sounds using the Fractal 1959 plexi, with whatever boosts, amp sims, EQs, IRs are available, you would have no problem getting a sound that was indistinguishable from Metallica 2cp patches.
But I think with real world gear it wouldn't be possible. It would break down somewhere in the chain and be subpar.
Things that make you go, "Hmmmmm...." :)Damn this new firmware really is the Gilmour-edition!
I reject your premise.Running things through a modeler has a homogenizing affect on things.
To be fair, he is using a Zoom G11…I reject your premise.