- Messages
- 6,560
Super greedy!This is the way.
(Though I have a VP4+FM9 for my live rig now and it's just...MORE BETTER)
Super greedy!This is the way.
(Though I have a VP4+FM9 for my live rig now and it's just...MORE BETTER)
I'm gonna get one. I don't think the VP4 will be enough for me. FM9 for rehearsals and shows, and Axe3 for home. That's where I'm heading.
(Though I have a VP4+FM9 for my live rig now and it's just...MORE BETTER)
I have a III and a FM9 with the studio/to go idea in mind but truth be told I tend to just use the FM9 these days.I'm gonna get one. I don't think the VP4 will be enough for me. FM9 for rehearsals and shows, and Axe3 for home. That's where I'm heading.
It's good at being smaller.is there anything the VP4 does better than the FM9
I've considered getting a VP4 to use with my Rivera Jazz amp but is there anything the VP4 does better than the FM9?
Don't change the reverb algorithm in cases where you need spillover to work well.One issue: apparently this is something other people have talked about, but when you switch channels in reverb, the spillover isn't good. Weird jumps up or down in volume if the channels are very different. Disappointed in that, any one have ideas to circumvent this?
Honestly I am loving the FM9 a lot, I already want to sell my tonex pedalboard (lol).Don't change the reverb algorithm in cases where you need spillover to work well.
Even if that was "fixed" it could sound weird too :)However, I think that is incredible goofy.
For this case, I would prefer a control switch, yes. I often have a control switch that toggles the AMP block channel to do this kind of thing -- add more gain to the AMP.Should I be using a control switch instead of scene toggle for switch 1?
Yeah 2 reverb blocks. I use one for my regular/typical hall sounds... and another for the huge ambient stuff.Honestly I am loving the FM9 a lot, I already want to sell my tonex pedalboard (lol).
However, I think that is incredible goofy. I am sure there are complicated technical reasons above my head why they haven't circumvented this issue, but with as smart as the people at Fractal are, I would have imagined a way to address this would have been implemented.
Obviously I'm a new user, and I need to learn the strengths/weaknesses of each unit I use, just a weird issue to run into on the 2nd day.
With all that said, I still like the FM9. Someone else mentioned using 2 reverb blocks to avoid this issue. Will give that a shot.
The realization that I won’t be able to get something like retro reel in fractal has sent me down a hole reading about how fractal effects blocks work. I like the way helix models specific effects units and they can be arranged like a virtual pedalboard. I don’t know if I like the idea of having to build an effect from scratch using a generic effect type block and tweaking it. Retro reel goes on most of the presets I build in helix and it’s become a part of my sound. Is there some way to get that sort of asymmetrical wobble I want? Am I making something out of nothing?It doesn't really have a direct equivalent. The Retro Reel is a lot like the Strymon Deco. You could use Fractal's Tape Distortion drive to emulate the tape drive and use tape delay, chorus or flanger blocks for the rest.
One thing Fractal doesn't really do is "multifx blocks" emulating a specific pedal. Like sure, you have modulation in delays and reverbs, but that's about where it ends.
Yup, use two blocks and switch between them.Honestly I am loving the FM9 a lot, I already want to sell my tonex pedalboard (lol).
However, I think that is incredible goofy. I am sure there are complicated technical reasons above my head why they haven't circumvented this issue, but with as smart as the people at Fractal are, I would have imagined a way to address this would have been implemented.
Obviously I'm a new user, and I need to learn the strengths/weaknesses of each unit I use, just a weird issue to run into on the 2nd day.
With all that said, I still like the FM9. Someone else mentioned using 2 reverb blocks to avoid this issue. Will give that a shot.
A Strymon Deco or Retro Reel, are basically one side that does flanging, chorus and then transitions to tape delay. The other side is tape distortion.The realization that I won’t be able to get something like retro reel in fractal has sent me down a hole reading about how fractal effects blocks work. I like the way helix models specific effects units and they can be arranged like a virtual pedalboard. I don’t know if I like the idea of having to build an effect from scratch using a generic effect type block and tweaking it. Retro reel goes on most of the presets I build in helix and it’s become a part of my sound. Is there some way to get that sort of asymmetrical wobble I want? Am I making something out of nothing?
Thanks; actually I don’t think retro reel even does a delay, it’s just the wobble itself, with some optional tape saturation.. you have to put it on a parallel path with a simple delay to get a deco like sound out if it, which I have done also.A Strymon Deco or Retro Reel, are basically one side that does flanging, chorus and then transitions to tape delay. The other side is tape distortion.
You can use the tape delay to replicate the delay. Tape delay -> Tape Distortion.
Then replace the Tape delay with some of the simpler chorus and flanger options.
I don't know if there's any modulation on Fractal that does random pattern modulation though?