Uncanny!
Shirt style. Earings. Nicely done... good lols.
I'm a "why not both" kind of man. I actually find more similarities between them, than differences.I can literally state my thoughts by replacing Line 6 with FAS in the above!
Horses for courses!
Yup. FM9 in the backpack, HX Stomp in the purse!
Personally I think the Axe III is a pretty great UI, if you frame it in the context of the things they have decided they need to present to make their product viable.Honestly, would like to have both, but I'm not convinced you can have a great UI with the level of control needed.
What do you mean? Double-tapping the footswitch to edit it in Axe Edit or something like that?I just want my "double-click footswitch to edit" option, goddamnit. Otherwise, I don't really have a problem.
Ahhh yeah, that'd be great.An option for people to choose, to emulate the functionality of Helix's capacitive footswitches pulling up the effect you touch, so you can edit quickly. Either double-tap or long press. In pedalboard/effects mode, double-tap to instantly bring up that effect's editing window tabs.
Obviously it should be an option, because many people use those functions for something else.
With the QC I just can't get too excited about it. It has glaring flaws that people are ignoring purely because of "ooooo shiny!" - the touchscreen is whack. Several shades of shittier than my Waldorf Iridium or the MPC grooveboxes.
Again, this has not been my recent experience with the QC touchscreen. I find it fast and overall a much better UI than any modeler I've owned (FAS, L6, Kemper).
(And I often defend FAS UI, as I think it gets overblown and I learned to be very quick on it, too.)
Say what you will about Neural as a company or the QC as a whole, but the UI is awesome, and sets the bar for on-device editing moving forward. IMO
Usability and features or modeling or fx quality are not mutually exclusive.Yes, and an electric scooter is easier to use than a Harley.
I'm a real life UX guy, and I'm utterly exhausted by the collective fetish over user friendliness in modeling. It gets thrown around as if it's the great equalizer regardless of tone, accuracy, and features. I think that's upside-down; if you can't compete on the things that matter, then ease-of-use is the only thing keeping your product viable....to some people.
I think to anyone 30 or under today, the QC would seem like a current device to them, something familiar and inviting and of their era, whereas an FAS unit probably looks and feels like it's literally from another century, like something they'd see in the background on Stranger Things.
Hey, if you're happy having to press an option 2 or 3 times because it doesn't register your finger, more power to you. But that was 100% my experience when I owned one for about 5 months. I sold it because it was frustrating to use and didn't sound anywhere near as good as the Axe FX.Again, this has not been my recent experience with the QC touchscreen. I find it fast and overall a much better UI than any modeler I've owned (FAS, L6, Kemper).
(And I often defend FAS UI, as I think it gets overblown and I learned to be very quick on it, too.)
No it doesn't. TMP does.Say what you will about Neural as a company or the QC as a whole, but the UI is awesome, and sets the bar for on-device editing moving forward. IMO
If you put the epic Fractal tones in the QC form factor the game would in fact be over. We could all move on with our lives.
No it doesn't. TMP does.
<ducks>
If you put the epic Fractal tones in the QC form factor the game would in fact be over. We could all move on with our lives.
I always feel like we are just one generation from modelers being just great all around, whether it's sounds, feel, features or usability.
Personally I think the Axe III is a pretty great UI, if you frame it in the context of the things they have decided they need to present to make their product viable.
NEVER! BATTLE TO THE DEAF!If you put the epic Fractal tones in the QC form factor the game would in fact be over. We could all move on with our lives.