Your passion for getting disappointed at modelling companies is truly inspiring. Maybe cause Iāve been following all this stuff for 10+ years none of this is really a surprise. Itās generally crickets from everyone except from fractal, they are the anomaly.
Also understand the rhetorical flourish inherent to forums. Most of us sound like we care more than we really do, I suspect. I didn't really expect them to instantly scream "OH NOES!! We been stomped!!!" Nor did I expect them to rush some new plan. But even an expression of confidence, that they saw the demo and remain sure of their course, would be something. They were active on that Discord - multiple staff members - and would respond when tagged, most days the same day. Then they got totally silent. That's all I was saying.
Helix has been copping crap for 2-3-4+ years about being āold techā and theyāve also been radio silent while other things got released. You donāt see knee jerk reactions and scrambling from these companies. You generally just wait and see how they respond. In Line6ās case they knocked it out of the park, in Kempers case it was a bit of a dud.
Yes and yes. I think the issue with Fender that I see is that they were playing catch up to the now legacy Helix - including adding scenes functionality they left off at launch, then fixing what was not right about the scenes at first. If they'd been going their own way in a clear way, it wouldn't seem so troubling for them to be left behind. But they just had their big thing - interface distinctiveness (and possibly advantage, we'll see) - reduced or erased while falling even further behind on function and content. They don't need to scramble - quite the contrary, being calm is obviously wise, especially in public facing communications. But the conspicuous and unusual silence seemed a little odd to me, too. Or not. Whatever.
I think we can see the course that Fender is on itās pretty obvious.
What is it? All I hear is "all things in time," and at a pace which is not keeping up, never mind catching up. And all things? Really? Everything? That's not happening, because new 'things' are emerging faster than they can fill the old gaps. If they're carving out and driving toward a product identity that is distinctive from both Line6 and Fractal modelers and still worth the similar price, that's exactly the kind of thing I would like them laying out on the Discord. They should absolutely feel free and empowered to say "We're leading in a different direction. Here's what it is. Hop on board." Right now, as I see it, they have fewer features, less content, and less stated direction than the others at very similar prices. And if anything, they're losing a little ground, not gaining it.
I donāt think fractal can do much besides a new unit having some nifty features but itāll be more of the same, maybe some nice parameter stacking to truly replicate chase bliss pedals and things like that.
Yeah, I agree on Fractal. They still have the best combo in modeling, IMO, of pure selection and quality of amps and effects. Other disadvantages compared to Stadium for sure, and of course many people's severe dislike of the on-unit interface.
QC is probably the next one to get an upgrade but I donāt see that happening for 2-3 years, similar to fractal
And outside of their core fans, I don't know how good their name is unless they start building a track record of delivering promises on time.
Anyway waiting for day to day news to come out from these companies is pointless. Just gotta use the stuff how it is now. And if you love update after update then the only real option is fractal.
And I have an FM9T. It's great for me, and I almost never use the on-unit interface (other than stepping on switches) anyway.
I think we talk past each other on this. You think I want lots of updates. That's not it in and of itself. I want a richly featured product with ample selection of sounds, which of course is going to be assessed relative to the competition. If a product is released with sparse features and content,
that's when I think a relatively quick cadence of substantially sized updates is called for, because the alternative it to always be trailing far (and now further) behind. An FM9 with slower (but still meaningful) updates would actually be fine by me (but no, Cliff, don't let that dissuade you), because it already offers so much.