Opinion based on plenty of first hand experience: the QC is faster. Touching a Helix footswitch (sometimes repeatedly to cycle through multiple blocks) isn't any faster than touching an amp/effect block directly on the QC screen, and once you've done the latter, the QC will take the lead simply by virtue of having more parameters displayed and more corresponding encoders.
Yes, bad faith is part of the forums. How many people give their opinion without having tried the TMP? Is the Helix at the end of its life? These are two things we don't know really. But it's likely that the Helix won't evolve much more, whereas the TMP is at the beginning of its life. No?
Not sure to understand but with the TMP you can also jump from block to block.
Pure speculation but because of business and evolution of chips.
Maybe, but while we’re speaking of likelihoods, isn’t it just as likely that Fender abandons TMP like they’ve done other products?
Sure. I would expect TMP to be equivalent to QC in this regard. But I have no firsthand experience with TMP.
Deep as a thimble.
Yeah, but with Presonus involved you'd think there'd be a greater possibility?I have no concrete information on this topic; but speaking as a casual observer with an MI industry interest:
Of all the possible near-future outcomes, a native plugin from Fender would seem to be the most unlikely to me!
They've always struck me as being entirely about shifting hardware units.
)
