- Messages
- 1,407
But ....its a fender....it must be goodI'd argue "not good." You can't have that many glaring misses on what is an $1800 unit once you
get taxed.
Fender be like ....
..... with the TMP.
But ....its a fender....it must be goodI'd argue "not good." You can't have that many glaring misses on what is an $1800 unit once you
get taxed.
Fender be like ....
..... with the TMP.
not sure. I have some awesome amps and like playing them but if i was gigging again and had to move stuff on my own i would go modeling. If i had roadies i would gig my amps for sure. I dont know him(maybe you do?) and i just wonder how beta testers are treated if for instance they say its not that great? Would fender still continue using them as a beta?That’s an awful lot of assumption for someone you know nothing about.
If YOU, TimBuck3, had an AWESOME pile of amps that you know and love and have gigged for years, would YOU stop using them in favor of an option that doesn’t do what you want, just so maybe someday if a company releases some new gear you might get the chance to try it before everyone else?
Because to me, that sounds like an exercise in fucking stupid.
Either way...the price is still too high for you...But ....its a fender....it must be good
and you and La szum too.Either way...the price is still too high for you...
not sure. I have some awesome amps and like playing them but if i was gigging again and had to move stuff on my own i would go modeling. If i had roadies i would gig my amps for sure. I dont know him(maybe you do?) and i just wonder how beta testers are treated if for instance they say its not that great? Would fender still continue using them as a beta?
Aside from the 5150 III Stealth Red model, I've not seen any public comments that there are specific fixes needed or in work. That is to say, if there are perceived shortcomings, those are not perceived by Fender, therefore are unlikely to be fixed.Hey All,
Long time no see. Any word on a future firmware update to address the perceived lackluster performance of the high-gain and Marshall amps? Any news or rumors about adding more amp choices?
Thanks!
This is my first time being a beta guy for Fender, and I am not sure how that makes me biased. I have owned the helix, Axefx2, and currently own the fractal FM9.but as a beta guy isnt he somewhat biased? I mean he wants to keep being a beta guy right?
their cabinet simulation sounds incredible
Aside from the 5150 III Stealth Red model, I've not seen any public comments that there are specific fixes needed or in work. That is to say, if there are perceived shortcomings, those are not perceived by Fender, therefore are unlikely to be fixed.
Fender has committed to updates every 6 months, but only time will tell if that will materialize. They have alluded to amp models being part of those updates.
Sure, and I wasn’t trying to frame my comment as a dig at fender. My point was: the only way anything will change is if fender agrees that a change is needed. Maybe that’s a better way to put it. So it doesn’t really matter if anyone perceives an issue if fender doesn’t share that observation.There was a bit of back and forth regarding the SIC being baked into the cab instead of the amp model, and I can see why Fender doesn't want to change that (being as it would require a pretty significant overhaul of the amp modeling). Minor tweaks to the gainier amp models shouldn't require major work, so we'll see if they decide to adjust them to make people happy (note I did not say "fix," as I don't want to open the debate on that topic).
well thanx for the explanation....I am alot like mc shred..lol...i would tell fender why i didnt like it if i didnt pretty openly.I actually know two of the beta testers very well, for close to 20 years and not just via the internet. They both were using Fractal units before they got the TMP. That’s why I hit @jdzialak today, I know he’s still gigging the TMP despite owning both killer amps and the FM9.
Because I’ve known those guys so long, the gear they’ve used/use, the tones they go for and how serious they are about it, I got excited for the TMP and the fact at least jdzialak is still using it says something to me.
And while jdzialak is a fairly mild-mannered dude, McShred, the other beta tester I know, is not. I have no doubt in my mind that @stilwel heard every single thing McShred did or didn’t dig about the TMP, along with colorful and creative language, possibly NSFW pics.
QC all over again?Maybe it's just me but when I read many of these posts by guys loving the TMP I check the post count and have consistently found them to be in the very low double digits.
What does that mean? I have no idea but it's an observable phenomenon.
this is where i’m at. I’ve even had it myself, where in the room I thought my tone was AMAZING, then I record it and listen back and it’s rubbish.Sorry but nearly everything I've ever heard from the TMP has been bowel.
'unnered percent guvnor.this is where i’m at. I’ve even had it myself, where in the room I thought my tone was AMAZING, then I record it and listen back and it’s rubbish.
Anecdotal experience is all nice to read but it’s pretty meaningless no matter what it comes from. Until I hear a TMP sounding as good as either real mic’d up gear (which other modellers can do pretty damn well), or at least comparing favourably to other modellers then the jury is massively out for me.
The amount of positive posts I’ve read about the TMP sounding great compared to actual audio of it is hugely disproportionate to me.
That doesn’t mean it couldn’t do a job in some situations - a lot of the time modellers don’t need to be particularly accurate or even sound THAT good. In context, other stuff will matter way more and as long as it’s reliable and has the right features it can do a job.
But is there even a single clip of the TMP JCM800/Friedman/Uber/IIC+/Recto sounding comparable to the real deal? Helix/QC/Fractal etc have all done that repeatedly. So far I haven’t heard a single user made clip of the TMP that was even close - no amount of anecdotal experiences will change that.