- Messages
- 5,825
regardless of what us forum folk are willing to believe, the main issue the masses have with digital amps is how they look and how you interact with them. Digital to them usually means "menus, weird cables, loading times, complex presets, inconsistent results, too many options". This fixes those issues. They can plonk it in their living room and feel like they own a real classic Fender amp. Its not a Katana or Positive Grid or that Yamaha thing which are all "small dick energy" digital devices by comparison.
We like to think that modelling accuracy is the barrier that needs to be broken, and for a minority of users it really is the most important factor. But the vast majority of guitarists could be playing a broken amp for decades without realising anything is wrong - they're certainly not going to care. I'd personally prefer the hassle and drawbacks of a real valve amplifier, thats kind of the point.
I agree totally. It’s why Fender is so well positioned with this series, since all their iconic amp offerings are tied to a classic combo form factor. These pass the eye test, which is more important than we’d probably care to admit.
Adding a loop is a good thing. I’d love to see them start to add some more digital crowd focused features on the back (generation switch as Laxu mention, hi/low pass filters etc) and then they could still keep classic controls on the face. Business in the front, party in the back