laxu
Rock Star
- Messages
- 5,422
I think most of the design comes from a "what makes sense for a live player" point of view. It takes a lot of things that work from the Amp 1 - all the amp controls, the footswitches and the way the controls are recessed a bit. Add a presence knob, and quick buttons to go to the main effect types you'd want to adjust. That's all good stuff and should make it really easy to work with if you treat it as just an amp.Its also a mix of random stuff bunched together, with a load of bland surfaces/textures and colours. Screams to me that its one person handling absolutely everything, when there should be other people on board doing what each of them do best. Wouldn't be surprised if Thomas is doing the website and handling all the emails as well.
The flap that opens is probably convenient to protect the unit, but I can bet most people would just prefer it didn't have it and cost a bit less. At best it should be an addition you can buy to prevent dust going into the top portion or something.
The upper section is where trouble starts, because it is likely to feel dated when it launches with its single encoder to navigate menus and the weird choice of non-encoder knobs for the "X-controls". Durable? Probably, but it still makes no sense to me and just adds extra complication.
BluGuitar is going to have another livestream tomorrow and if I'm not busy I'll try to check it out and ask why they didn't use infinite rotaries for the X-controls.