State of Epicicity
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,255
We watched Plan 9 From Outer Space. I had seen it a couple of decades ago, but I forgot just how a lot of it is surprisingly boring. But there are still a lot of moments where the prodigiously awkward dialog combines with the no less than brutal acting to make cinematic magic.
I feel like The Disaster Artist was very inspired by Ed Wood, the idea of making the highest quality film about someone who makes the very lowest quality film. This is the Dizzying Paradox genre of cinema.
I'm also put in mind if Timothy Carey's The World's Greatest Sinner from 1962. I kept thinking, "Yeah, no wonder this asshole didn't get any funding." I'm thoroughly convinced that most of Hollywood has always been comprised of people who essentially just don't want to work for a living. It's one industry where incompetent, lazy people have so often risen to the top that it feels like a lottery.
With Ed Wood, he seems like a guy who loved the idea of movies, without ever studying what makes a director, actor, or writer great, or even good. To me a good artist is someone who can tell if what they do sucks.
So why begin to criticize B movies? What's the point? I don't get pissed off about it often, but sometimes it makes me think of every band I've been in where I'm working my fucking ass off and some asshole I'm working with hasn't even bothered to practice. It feels exactly the same. You can see when people are working and when they don't, and it's in great film too; it's this incongruous, disjointed patchwork of artists that I think of zeitgeist.
The most B of B movies represents a ridiculous extreme, but it's indicative to me of charlatans in all areas of life, and when I think of it that way, it stops being fun and just gets way under my skin.
The same goes for the other end, when films are so pretentious they are trying to fool you they've created something mind blowing when they're really just trying to cover up for their inherent lack of creativity. We recently tried to watch The Assassin from 2015, and it was beautifully shot, the sound was incredibly mixed, and it was bullshit. Pretentious shit. My wife kept making smartass commentary until I shut it off. Tarkovsky falls in this category too, along with what Terrence Malik became.
To me you can just feel when a movie is coming from a real place, just like when you can tell a person is phoney. And that is I guess the main thing that pulls me in or repels me fundamentally.
I feel like The Disaster Artist was very inspired by Ed Wood, the idea of making the highest quality film about someone who makes the very lowest quality film. This is the Dizzying Paradox genre of cinema.
I'm also put in mind if Timothy Carey's The World's Greatest Sinner from 1962. I kept thinking, "Yeah, no wonder this asshole didn't get any funding." I'm thoroughly convinced that most of Hollywood has always been comprised of people who essentially just don't want to work for a living. It's one industry where incompetent, lazy people have so often risen to the top that it feels like a lottery.
With Ed Wood, he seems like a guy who loved the idea of movies, without ever studying what makes a director, actor, or writer great, or even good. To me a good artist is someone who can tell if what they do sucks.
So why begin to criticize B movies? What's the point? I don't get pissed off about it often, but sometimes it makes me think of every band I've been in where I'm working my fucking ass off and some asshole I'm working with hasn't even bothered to practice. It feels exactly the same. You can see when people are working and when they don't, and it's in great film too; it's this incongruous, disjointed patchwork of artists that I think of zeitgeist.
The most B of B movies represents a ridiculous extreme, but it's indicative to me of charlatans in all areas of life, and when I think of it that way, it stops being fun and just gets way under my skin.
The same goes for the other end, when films are so pretentious they are trying to fool you they've created something mind blowing when they're really just trying to cover up for their inherent lack of creativity. We recently tried to watch The Assassin from 2015, and it was beautifully shot, the sound was incredibly mixed, and it was bullshit. Pretentious shit. My wife kept making smartass commentary until I shut it off. Tarkovsky falls in this category too, along with what Terrence Malik became.
To me you can just feel when a movie is coming from a real place, just like when you can tell a person is phoney. And that is I guess the main thing that pulls me in or repels me fundamentally.