MirrorProfiles
Rock Star
- Messages
- 3,769
It’s already the biggest chassis Marshall have ever used, they had to make it deeper because their standard size won’t fit the amp in. As I’ve said before, I don’t think any of the numbers would make sense for Marshall to put another JVM amp into production, especially so if it requires totally different chassis and headcabs to make it work. The demand would be so small for a stripped down JVM that I really can’t see the point, it’s a miracle JVM’s are still in production in all honesty.For reference, my 4x10 is about 10 cm narrower than the JVM410 head. It's not much, but enough to make it look a bit odd on top of it.
4x10s are a classic case of "nobody famous used them, so they're not popular." The Super Reverb and Bassman, as used by SRV and others, remain basically the few somewhat popular 4x10s.
Yes, compared to many other amps there's plenty of space, and I can bet that amp could be designed to fit into even less. They just didn't need to do it when they knew it was going into this big box form factor.
If they ever make a successor, I'd love to have it be a bit smaller and lighter.
I also think it’s unlikely Marshall would deviate too much from their current sizes, it’s just more economical to keep things consistent. All their full fat heads have kept similar sizes for years, and I think they want to preserve the general look for a half stack and full stack.