TheTrueZoltan!
Shredder
- Messages
- 1,768
@GuitarJon Hey Jon, why didn't you feature the Amperium Live in the comparison?
Lol, this post wasn't even about ME, yet even *I* feel guilted into taking actionBe the change you want to see in the world.
That's what you get for putting Turd Blaster Pro in the same category with actual flagship units.The results speak for themselves I guess?
You're not allowed to switch until you get us JCM and one click "I don't give a f*uck about your tap tempo" tuner.I want an AxeFx so freaking bad.
GuitarJon didn't do that; Fender did that themselves. The pricing alone puts it head to head with the top players in the market.That's what you get for putting Turd Blaster Pro in the same category with actual flagship units.
I'm not switching, I'm going to enjoy both.You're not allowed to switch
I'm not switching, I'm going to enjoy both.
BUY ONE NAOW!!!I want an AxeFx so freaking bad.
again i say: fender should have released this will like all their unique fender amps in it only.at 1k....why the gtx100 approach for this? they are fender right? stick to fenderExcellent comparison.
Further cements my opinion on the TMP based on everything i've heard so far: very nice UX, beautiful Fender cleans, spongy convolution reverbs... but everything else sounds a bit lackluster tbh.
i call bs on that whole story: its like when you read actors backstories-most of them are bs and fakery as are their names most of the time.Same with cia/inqtel and silicon valley..all fakeryKinda a double-whammy on the EVH models; supposedly Matt Bruck, Ed’s right-hand man, is the one who signed off on the EVH models after he was being very picky about them.
I doubt if the whole story is false. It's probably safe to say there was some pressure for EVH to eventually sign off on the model since the brand is under the Fender umbrella, though. Otherwise EVH probably wouldn't have risked putting any kind of endorsement on a model of such a well-respected amp brand.i call bs on that whole story: its like when you read actors backstories-most of them are bs and fakery as are their names most of the time.
From everything I've seen about this the hardware is done right, and it's the programming that's lacking just like the QC. The QC isn't even where they promised they would be 'SOON" after launch. Laughable.again i say: fender should have released this will like all their unique fender amps in it only.at 1k....why the gtx100 approach for this? they are fender right? stick to fender
fractal is primed to take the whole market if they put a slick gui on the axefx4/fm10 next unit but it has to come 2024From everything I've seen about this the hardware is done right, and it's the programming that's lacking just like the QC. The QC isn't even where they promised they would be 'SOON" after launch. Laughable.
Good hardware costs $$$ to make. They went for a flagship model out the gate, and only got it half (OK maybe 2/3's right). Not good enough though IMO when an FM9 at the same cost wipes the floor with it.
Fender has to get their shit together fast. Helix is still way better (but not improving much these days).
Fractal has had a major reverb update. Released Cab Lab 4 for free with Dyna-Cabs you can purchase. But you can also mix any regular IR's you have. And even made minor updates to their amp modelling. All very recently. The gap just gets wider.
C'mon Fender. Are you gonna do Fender things, or are you gonna step up for once and play with the big boys.
Sincerely,
Not Hopeful
Maybe Matt Bruck just has shitty ears.i call bs on that whole story: its like when you read actors backstories-most of them are bs and fakery as are their names most of the time.
True, and that's a great point. But, the difference that I'm hearing in the TMP's EVH model is the same difference I've often heard in lesser modelers/plugins of the past, so I'm inclined to believe it's at least as much the TMP's model as it is the specific amp they modeled.Just a friendly reminder that unless Fender, Fractal Audio, and Neural DSP all modeled the EXACT amplifier with the EXACT component values, all three models will sound different.
TD;DR This comparison, like most A/B comparisons, is flawed.