JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 16,462
This is one of the dumbest fucking things I’ve ever read.
This is one of the dumbest fucking things I’ve ever read.
incredible how actual musicians survived with one marshall, one cab, one guitar for so long without having all the cabs and all the amps in a box
This is one of the dumbest fucking things I’ve ever read.
If you read my post again you will find that it's logical and accurate. Ironically so. Hence the question, posted in multiple forms: "how is modelling cheating?". Some people understand it as stealing IP for others a personal offence due to the fact that they enjoy modelling. My initial post had a number of scenarios which described what I consider cheating. The point was not that modelling is cheating - which makes no sense, because cheating is a human act -.But it’s exactly what you get when somebody tries to rationalize an emotional bias.
If you read my post again you will find that it's logical and accurate. Ironically so. Hence the question, posted in multiple forms: "how is modelling cheating?". Some people understand it as stealing IP for others a personal offence due to the fact that they enjoy modelling. My initial post had a number of scenarios which described what I consider cheating. The point was not that modelling is cheating - which makes no sense, because cheating is a human act -.
Have you ever read anything Paul Reed Smith said about tonewood? Or pretty much anyone in the gurusphere says about mic preamps? Or audiophiles say about cables?This is one of the dumbest fucking things I’ve ever read.
This one of my favorite taking-a-shit reads. The laughter helps keep things moving.Or audiophiles say about cables?
As a company who uses SPICE modelling in certain capacities for our software products, I can tell you that we are MILES from profiling when using this technique.Then as you read upwards in the logs you'll start finding some mentions of "SPICE" which is what people refer to when they talk about component based modelling.
Christoph Kemper, himself, once described how the Kemper works. In short it has two or three base amp models with multiple variables - more than what we see on the interface. The profiling process tries to fit one of the base models to the test tone by varying the variables.As a company who uses SPICE modelling in certain capacities for our software products, I can tell you that we are MILES from profiling when using this technique.
I WISH we could figure how to do the same thing with profiling. I actually see other companies sort of doing it, but we can't seem to get 100% there with profiling
I suppose this is what Tonex does but applied to a model with more variables. Maybe Kemper works the same way but it came out long before the "AI" craze.
You see, nothing changed. You can still get an amp, a cab and a guitar and it would still require the same amount of effort today. Probably even more so because accommodating such a setup would require a more select rental space on top of the inflated prices on gear. If you already have the space and the money then you put the effort in some other venue in your life instead of music so you didn't paid your due to the music. If you go the easy route, simulations, which by all means is absolutely not the same as running the real things then you didn't invest the same energy as someone who uses the real things. If you indeed spent the energy to learn the craft, explored all that is to be explored and finally choose to go the easy route then you can see it as a reward. But starting fresh and choosing the easy route means you're trying to cheat and that'll never work. And yeah ... having subscribers on YT doesn't amount to anything. That's not art. That's marketing.
All I said applies to me as well. And if that's all the gear you own then I'm far more guiltyHoly shit, if we banned people for the shittiest possible take, you’d definitely be the first one to be awarded the ban before it becomes cool. I don’t know if you’re using a sock to filter the spray paint before you huff it, but get thicker socks or upgrade to Krylon.
What exactly do you do with your gear? I think I heard a sound clip before, but anything worthwhile? Or does it serve as some imaginary trump card you use those ridiculous mental gymnastics to pull out of your ass on forums as a way of trying to speak down to people?
In case you’re not aware, your posts come off as the latter and not the former. Bad form.
The living room rig in my apartment says “Suck my balls”
View attachment 21450
DyingI don’t know if you’re using a sock to filter the spray paint before you huff it, but get thicker socks or upgrade to Krylon.
All I said applies to me as well. And if that's all the gear you own then I'm far more guilty
Dig the Orville.
You actually considered having a career in music?You can just leave it at “Applies to me” because you have no clue why people me the gear or living space choices they’ve made and any bullshit about “earning” it exists in your mind only. I bought more tube amps when doing the “I’m a dumbass and believe I have to sacrifice financial stability for a career in music” than I did as a homeowner when I made considerably more money and now I live in an apartment and make more money than I did when I was a homeowner.
Yeah, I busted my ass as a musician for a long time, but I don’t feel THAT aspect of things “earned” me the right or privildedge or any weird shit attached to owning a piece of gear any more than someone who picked up a guitar 5 months ago and bought their first tube amp or modeler last week.
As long as they’re loving the experience of playing through it and they didn’t steal it, they’ve earned the joy of being a musician and anything else is some dick measuring/insecurity shit.
You actually considered having a career in music?
You actually considered having a career in music?
Never been there but I I imagine it must be less glamorous after a certain age unless you make it. These days, there's no more making it in that sense, I guess.I tried it in my younger days. Managed a music store, taught guitar, and gigged 150+ nights a year. Way too much work for way too little money, and this was long before the internet so there wasn't even the option of being the condescending, hot shit "I do this for a living" know-it-all.
NAM/ToneX/Tonocracy/Proteus / Anything pytorch/tensorflow related are creating neural models from scratch based on the source audio vs the amped audioChristoph Kemper, himself, once described how the Kemper works. In short it has two or three base amp models with multiple variables - more than what we see on the interface. The profiling process tries to fit one of the base models to the test tone by varying the variables.
I suppose this is what Tonex does but applied to a model with more variables. Maybe Kemper works the same way but it came out long before the "AI" craze.
The document I linked, by Cliff, tells, tongue in cheek, the same thing.