- Messages
- 6,280
Yeah. It was.Not the same context as everyone else.
Be clearer with your words. It is what your hero would want.Not talking about you.
That deserves a poo-poo emoji.Sorry you use them as beta testers for BFD.
Yeah. It was.Not the same context as everyone else.
Be clearer with your words. It is what your hero would want.Not talking about you.
That deserves a poo-poo emoji.Sorry you use them as beta testers for BFD.
Once I'm done with my Japan trip next month, I might pick up a 700watter Powerstage and check it out.
The assertion here is that these class D poweramps cannot provide their rated wattage in a sustained fashion. The PS200 gives 210W at a 4ohm load. But that might just be a peak reading.Really?!? I actually get on fine with the 170 and would never consider the 700 as an option if I needed something with more oomph. The dumbest form factor ever (1.25U?!?), no independent volume knobs for the two channels. And very similar power supply to the 170/200.
DUMB AF form factor. Isn't there some 'can't run it for full wattage rating mono; or other such dumbness?Really?!? I actually get on fine with the 170 and would never consider the 700 as an option if I needed something with more oomph. The dumbest form factor ever (1.25U?!?), no independent volume knobs for the two channels. And very similar power supply to the 170/200.
In the same vein as the Katana. If I wanted power amp coloration; I'd just get a regular guitar amp. That's why the Fryette stuff (despite being impossible to get most of the time) is the most appealing when you are trying to get out of the modeling's way with whatever you are using for power.
even if it does do that, why not spend less on a 2U poweramp with better features since 2U vs 1.25U with Mickey Mouse ears is still basically the same thing?The assertion here is that these class D poweramps cannot provide their rated wattage in a sustained fashion. The PS200 gives 210W at a 4ohm load. But that might just be a peak reading.
So the theory is, more wattage means more headroom, means more chance of actually sustaining 100W continuously into a 4ohm load.
Yeah, I don’t remember exactly what it was, but was definitely another issue.DUMB AF form factor. Isn't there some 'can't run it for full wattage rating mono; or other such dumbness?
Such as?even if it does do that, why not spend less on a 2U poweramp with better features since 2U vs 1.25U with Mickey Mouse ears is still basically the same thing?
I think I got in argument about it with FPLPLPLLP at TOP.Yeah, I don’t remember exactly what it was, but was definitely another issue.
As but one example, there is the @James Freeman approvedSuch as?
IME people who like the power stage ( any of them) are leaning heavily on the powerful eq and aren’t needing or using to compete with tubes or loud band mates . They are very user friendly and fine for home but that is it.
Never tried the Orange but it's class AB so it's by default better but I agree ... I have tried the Katana head this way and never got even decent results... ( must be some class D circuitry embedded in its class AB power amp )In the same vein as the Katana. If I wanted power amp coloration; I'd just get a regular guitar amp. That's why the Fryette stuff (despite being impossible to get most of the time) is the most appealing when you are trying to get out of the modeling's way with whatever you are using for power.
Actually I just checked the datasheet of the icepower module that's likely inside the PS200 and it says it can provide 130-140W of continuous power into 4 ohms.The assertion here is that these class D poweramps cannot provide their rated wattage in a sustained fashion. The PS200 gives 210W at a 4ohm load. But that might just be a peak reading.
So the theory is, more wattage means more headroom, means more chance of actually sustaining 100W continuously into a 4ohm load.
... If it still sounds like absolute arsecandy