New to Modeling and Want to Dip my Toe in the Water

Sexy Cbs GIF by Paramount+
 
OneEng said:
That isn't at all how it works.

Capturing/profiling creates a system response. In math terms, it builds a Laplace transform of the system response of the amp and cab (look up signal and system processing if you want to really get your head in a bind, then think of the Kemper as building the function H(s)).

As I said, all of these "capture/profile" amps ALSO include a modeling SECTION that allows modification of the captured system response.

Liquid profiling (the latest enhancement to the MODELING section of the Kemper) attempts to make the controls on the Kemper mirror the controls and behavior of those controls from the original amp. Exe, if the amp had only a low and high eq knob, then the Liquid profile would only have those 2 controls. These controls would be modeled to have the same eq effect as the original amp did for those controls. The original Kemper profiles ALL had a 4 band eq that always behaved the same way on every profile. Some long-time Kemper users prefer using the standard controls from the Kemper on all profiles while others want their profiles to have the same controls as the original amp. Note: Since every amp has different behavior of the controls, this means that it is more difficult to get a handle on exactly what tweaking a specific knob is going to do to the sound (unless you are very familiar with that specific amp and how it behaves.

FWIW, I have never heard anyone that has played on both a Kemper and a Helix say they preferred the sound of the Helix. The general consensus between the top end Fractal and Kemper is that they both can create a very convincing tube tone with Fractal being able to do more with the EFX chain than Kemper and Kemper having slightly better raw tube tone.

Helix is a good value though and does quite a lot very well, it just falls short of the more expensive Fractal and Kemper.

My opinion is that a used Kemper Stage is as good a deal as can be found for live gigging, bar none.
Click to expand...

OneEng said:
Since only the profiler/capture device is attempting to recreate a specific amp, a Modeler, by definition, can not be compared directly to the sound of the amp it is attempting to recreate and therefore muddies the water for what "sounds better" having eliminated the ability to simply say "sounds exactly like" and utilize the base sound as the original tube amp itself.

Opinions of what "sounds better" are prolific in the extreme. Attempting to determine which person's "sounds better" will match your own is therefore impossible.

Statistically (based on my own reading of thousands of posts all over the internet and among my own group of friends that gig with various rigs), guitarist that value the sound of a good tube amp with minimal lathering of effects on it gravitate to profilers/capture devices. The Kemper is currently the best profiler/capture device on the market with respect to gigging features and workflow using the same statistical process.



Then you think that quite a few people with pretty impressive guitar playing credentials are not objective. Find me a review where Fractal, Kemper, the original tube amp, and helix are compared where the Helix was the preferred sound. I would be interested in hearing this.


While both can be made to sound good (at least to my ear), it is easier for a person used to dealing with a tube amp and pedals to get the Kemper into the desired "tone" than the Helix (or Fractal for that matter). I know many people that would argue that the Helix in particular is simply not capable of reaching the same raw tube amp tone as either Fractal or Kemper. It is only when you bring the Helix considerable processing and efx capabilities to bear that a "good" sound is achieved (even by your own example). Many would argue that this "good" sound, while still a "good" sound is not the sound and behavior of a real tube amp.... but is still good.


Never said or even eluded to such an utterly absurd statement.

I contend that MOST guitarist that gig, are NOT tweakers. They (as a statistical group) are interested in characteristics of traditional tube amps with respect to the ability to cut through the mix and sit in the mix nicely playing live. They are interested in pedalboard visibility, workflow, and usability including ergonomics, spill-over, and patch switching times as well as workflow enhancing features for a live performance.

Tweakers, on the other hand generally could care less what kind of foot controller the guitar processor has since they will (NEARLY ALWAYS) be using a PC to manipulate the plethora of settings and routings that the device offers. They are (statistically speaking) most interested in what kinds of sounds they can get and delight in creativity of new and original ways of processing a guitar that result in original sounds while being only mildly interested in re-creating the sound of a traditional raw tube amp tone.

It is not unreasonable to expect that a profiler with a good live pedalboard workflow would be preferred by a live musician while a great PC editor and superior flexibility of a modeler would be preferred by a tweaker.

Before everyone here gets their panties all in a bunch, I have seen the Helix used well in a live gig on more than one occasion. That still doesn't make it a superior tool to the Kemper for live use. It only means that you CAN achieve a good live result with it.

FYI, pay careful attention to what the OP said. See where he is coming from and think about what features would be most useful to him and be easiest to use. He isn't asking what your favorite modeler/profiler is. He is asking which one would best fit his needs.
Click to expand...
TLDR
 
No matter how "streamlined" you try to make this process because you don't want to do anything that's "hard"; you are going to have to put in some work. With a bunch of devices.
 
JiveTurkey said:
No matter how "streamlined" you try to make this process because you don't want to do anything that's "hard"; you are going to have to put in some work. With a bunch of devices.
Click to expand...
"because you don't want to da anything that's hard" is an assumption. Maybe I'll forget about modeling then and stick to my amps and pedalboard. I ain't no engineer, and ain't got no time for all that. I spend too much time playing the guitar, bass and piano so ain't got much time at all for building a sound from scratch.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

kartikg3
NMD: BOSS GX-100
Replies
19
Views
394
kartikg3
kartikg3
deepskyone
Over-engineering my silent practice rig: IR-J + VP4
2
Replies
34
Views
1K
Baba
Baba
L
Tell me about the Headrush MX5
2
Replies
24
Views
3K
MadMaxG79
MadMaxG79
Sascha Franck
Boss GT-1000 (and possibly other things Boss...)
2 3 4
Replies
61
Views
941
Sascha Franck
Sascha Franck
TSJMajesty
Shaping Your Tone: Can We Discuss EQ And The Various Ways You Use It?
2
Replies
30
Views
576
Ed DeGenaro
Ed DeGenaro
Back
Top