2dor
Roadie
- Messages
- 397
I got another QC recently and while NAM is definitely better, with some of the lessons learned while shooting NAM profiles, helped me get pretty good QC captures. They lack some of the high-end detail / low-mid depending on the amp but they're pretty serviceable for gigging.Tried the QC head to head vs. Tonocracy (mainly NAM captures). Comparing NAM vs. a capture of NAM (so not real amp), QC sounds a bit more bloated on the low end and brittle on the high end even after EQ, but close enough for rock n’ roll. NAM, though felt and sounded better all around. Both through same IR.
Then, I tried a few QC amp models and amp captures against similar NAM captures, and even though not apples to apples, the extra detail and better feel of NAM (and Tonocracy) was evident.
Just data. No judgement here lol. YMMV and of course QC offers much more.