laxu
Rock Star
- Messages
- 5,483
It's the other effects selection and quality that I have more complaints about. Drives and amps could be easily augmented with captures from day one. But I was not happy with the mod, delay, reverb sections of the QC when put head to head against the Helix or Fractal back when I had it on release. The list of those has grown, but I don't think they have updated the quality?I know us FAS fans love constant updates but it's not needed . The QC has just about everything you'd need. Id say everything but obviously it's not the case for everyone.
Are more amps and effects cool? Absolutely, and when you compare it to the competition, it is lacking. But in its current state, its more than capable. Add in the capture side of things and it somewhat covers missing amps. I know a capture isn't the same as a full model but QC owners can play a Badlander equivalent on their QC, something people have been wishing for since the Badlander launch in the fractal world.
I feel we are a tad too harsh on the QC at times. They deserve the eye rolls but it is a good sounding device with plenty going for it.
https://neuraldsp.com/device-list has a good number of "announced but not released" devices, and it seems they have even replaced some drive/amp models with just captures?
Considering the ~3.5x price of the QC vs my Hotone A2 Stomp, the list of models on offer are not too far off. While especially amp/cab models are better on the QC, I feel like the Hotone punches above its price range, while the QC feels like it's not quite delivering for the money.
The two companies are also similar in a way, where you just don't know what either are going to do, or when.