What hurts the nano is the lack of a screen and a reliance on Bluetooth. The Meris Enzo taught me never to buy a complicated pedal that doesn’t have a user interface of any kind. I loved every demo of the Enzo I heard, and when I got the pedal, I found it an absolute chore to use.More than the QC I think this really hurts Nano
Sitting directly in their price point with capture and a ton of effects
Realistically if it takes NDSP another 6 months or a year to implement a handful more of fx , I think they have to look at new pricing in the 399-450 range
Mooer just released the GS1000li. It's basically competition for the QC, Kemper etc and I found it to be very solid! The one that I got has a built in battery, so that was cool and unexpected! Good amount of effects (350 or so) and the profile that I made turned out very accurate.
I think it's cool that there's a lot of competition out there because hopefully this will push all the companies to up their game!
Check it out:
What hurts the nano is the lack of a screen and a reliance on Bluetooth. The Meris Enzo taught me never to buy a complicated pedal that doesn’t have a user interface of any kind. I loved every demo of the Enzo I heard, and when I got the pedal, I found it an absolute chore to use.
They've had a profiling app for iPad (!!!), which nobody really used, since forever. The real question is why did it took so long for it to show up on any of the 5,000 hardware products Mooer sells these days.
I know, I'm just being a sarcastic dick.To be fair, I’ve had the Mooer Preamp Live and the Preamp X, and I have to say even their basic capture technology has always been damn good.
Agreed although I like the layout it simpleWhat hurts the nano is the lack of a screen and a reliance on Bluetooth. The Meris Enzo taught me never to buy a complicated pedal that doesn’t have a user interface of any kind. I loved every demo of the Enzo I heard, and when I got the pedal, I found it an absolute chore to use.
I feel like this is the next product coming from Fractal. The VP4 platform is too good not to expand it. I could see other devices in the near future from Fractal that fit in a VP4 size enclosure that use capture tech or have a smattering of their amp sims.I wish NDSP had released this box with a screen one path
Four encoders scaled down QC
That would have been a solid move , but they did not , they focus solely on the capture functionality which appears to be the easiest tech to reproduce well and at competitive pricing
So, did they reverse-engineer the QC or the Kemper?
What lets me a little meh are there effects, honestly.
And the Ampero II stuff IMOMore than the QC I think this really hurts Nano
Sitting directly in their price point with capture and a ton of effects
Realistically if it takes NDSP another 6 months or a year to implement a handful more of fx , I think they have to look at new pricing in the 399-450 range
If the A2 Stomp could create captures somehow, the Nano Cortex would be a joke. The Hotone still runs rings around it in so many ways and is closest to the "Dual Cortex" most people were hoping for.And the Ampero II stuff IMO
The VP4 platform is too good not to expand it.
The VA1 Virtual amp/ cab box in the same format would be pretty coolI feel like this is the next product coming from Fractal. The VP4 platform is too good not to expand it. I could see other devices in the near future from Fractal that fit in a VP4 size enclosure that use capture tech or have a smattering of their amp sims.
Our friend following the forum again
I know, I'm just being a sarcastic dick.