Line 6 Helix Stadium

red-sauce-on-pasta-this-is-sparta.gif


@DLC86 as we speak.
If he were still around to participate lol
 
No shit. Have I not even said that myself multiple times already? would you rather bring something to the discussion or just go in circles of bickering?

Sigh.

To use the sushi analogy. Something like hype is like putting ketchup on sushi. Some might like what it does, and who knows, maybe in some instances it might surprise me in a good way. But good sushi doesn’t need extra.

I do wish companies would allow more global “Hide” functions. I get the programming nightmare that would be, but giving granular control to the user to completely hide various aspects of the system would be pretty cool. Would greatly streamline menu trees and screen objects for users.

Probably a support disaster, but sounds good in theory. :ROFLMAO:
 
I do wish companies would allow more global “Hide” functions. I get the programming nightmare that would be, but giving granular control to the user to completely hide various aspects of the system would be pretty cool. Would greatly streamline menu trees and screen objects for users.

Probably a support disaster, but sounds good in theory. :ROFLMAO:
See my boot time/startup feature request. Forwarded by DI to the Devs.

😂
 
I do wish companies would allow more global “Hide” functions. I get the programming nightmare that would be, but giving granular control to the user to completely hide various aspects of the system would be pretty cool. Would greatly streamline menu trees and screen objects for users.

Probably a support disaster, but sounds good in theory. :ROFLMAO:
See FAS Performance Mode etc for the solution most likely to meet all (most?) needs. Stadium’s big ass touchscreen and encoders would accommodate configuration and usage, respectively, very nicely.
 
I do wish companies would allow more global “Hide” functions. I get the programming nightmare that would be, but giving granular control to the user to completely hide various aspects of the system would be pretty cool. Would greatly streamline menu trees and screen objects for users.

Probably a support disaster, but sounds good in theory. :ROFLMAO:
digging into settings to hide/unhide features sounds way more complicated than just scrolling past them
 
I do wish companies would allow more global “Hide” functions. I get the programming nightmare that would be, but giving granular control to the user to completely hide various aspects of the system would be pretty cool. Would greatly streamline menu trees and screen objects for users.

Probably a support disaster, but sounds good in theory. :ROFLMAO:
Or we could let users collect all the stuff they do use as favorites and organize them however they like into nested folders.
 
Or we could let users collect all the stuff they do use as favorites and organize them however they like into nested folders.
If this is the deal on Stadium, I can’t wait. QC let’s you tag faves within given effect groups so that they appear at the top of those specific effect type folders, but some of my most used blocks are kind of ambiguous as to which folder they fall under, and finding the folder in the first place is a huge PITA. I would (will?) LOVE the ability to organize folders/ sub-folders of most used blocks from across all different effect etc. types.
 
No shit. Have I not even said that myself multiple times already? would you rather bring something to the discussion or just go in circles of bickering?

Sigh.

To use the sushi analogy. Something like hype is like putting ketchup on sushi. Some might like what it does, and who knows, maybe in some instances it might surprise me in a good way. But good sushi doesn’t need extra.

woah woah woah. Hold up.

I'm pretty sure my missus aint gonna slash my throat in my sleep if I use the hype knob.

But ketchup on sushi? Fucking hell. You're playing a dangerous game, me duck.

Yeah @MirrorProfiles , dogshit analogy. NO ONE puts ketchup on sushi. SOME people will use the hype knob.
 
QC let’s you tag faves within given effect groups so that they appear at the top of those specific effect type folders...
We talked about this 7, 8 years ago but it'd totally break our mono/stereo/legacy subcategories. In retrospect, maybe we should've made all distortions mono, all delays stereo, etc. At the time it was about squeezing the very most out of one's DSP and embracing the whole shoegaze distortion-after-reverb thing, but in stereo. Live and learn.
 
How are you going to hype a twin reverb? squeaky clean knopfler, crunchy srv or gainy george thorogood?
Jcm800 = tight high gain slayer?
Plexi = light crunch ac/dc or super gainy van halen?
Rectifier = mid forward limpbizkit or uberscooped godsmack?

Who's deciding what the hype knob will do and who knows for certain what other people believe an amp they never played sounds like?
How redundant the hype knob will be after people try it and decide it's not what they thought the amp should sound like? Isn't knob-real-estate valuable?
What is the probability that more than half of people will find more than half of the hype knobs in more than half the amp models useful?
 
How are you going to hype a twin reverb? squeaky clean knopfler, crunchy srv or gainy george thorogood?
Jcm800 = tight high gain slayer?
Plexi = light crunch ac/dc or super gainy van halen?
Rectifier = mid forward limpbizkit or uberscooped godsmack?

Who's deciding what the hype knob will do and who knows for certain what other people believe an amp they never played sounds like?
How redundant the hype knob will be after people try it and decide it's not what they thought the amp should sound like? Isn't knob-real-estate valuable?
What is the probability that more than half of people will find more than half of the hype knobs in more than half the amp models useful?

I completely agree. All valid questions, but I’m also pretty certain they’ve thought of the same questions. So we’ll see if it’s clever, or a complete utter fumble.
 
Back
Top