But they both bother me for the same reason. Why tf can’t you just ignore it? If you don’t want any features on a modeler that you aren’t going to use, maybe an all in one modeler isn’t what you’re looking for. I probably use about 10% of the features on helix. You don’t see me going around bitching that everything else needs to be removed.
I obviously can ignore it (how many times have I stated Im totally cool with others finding a use for it?), but why not discuss the pro's and con's with it? All I said was if I could hide it, I would, as the concept doesn't appeal to me. Baffles me how it's impossible for some people to have a discussion on things without getting culty or weirdly loyal to a particular brand. Hype is one way to skin that cat, which comes with its own pro's and con's.
Give me the Line6 He Gets US model that sounds better than the best Fender amp models.
Give me the Line6 Super Shart model that sounds like the best Marshall "brown sound" ever made.
Give me the Line6 My Anaconda Don't Want None Unless You Got Badonk Hun model that sounds like the biggest, ballsiest, yet tight high gain thing. No matter how it's achieved.
Who gets to decide which one sounds best though? It just leads to situations like the 2204 with no bright cap, or broken RAT until we go full circle and end up with the stock circuits. Do we really want to go through all that shite again?
Are the devs who make amp models also the same people who happen to have the best taste with mods? I'd rather the circuits were defined by the amp companies, not an employee from another company with their own opinions. Give us the circuits we know and love and that the vast majority are familiar with. Optional mods are cool where they make sense, but even then I'd still rather they're based on stuff that is commonly done and tried and tested rather than a Frankenstein amp that is one persons idea of perfect.
Better than the best Fender amp models, best Super Shart, best high gain is all subjective and never going to satisfy as many people as just going after the stone cold classics. What's with the assumption that the stock sounds can always be improved somehow? I just don't see it. I also don't see (for instance) Fractal users saying things like "the IIC+ is so awesome and incredible authentic, but I just wish it had an extra "punch" parameter". The amps already sound great, thats why we want to use models of them. Line 6 have an INSANE collection of incredible amps, and they can afford to find the examples they like best.
I've said before that I would gladly throw every brand name amp model found in modelers into the thrash can and use only original models if they sound good.
Why? Are amp models based on existing circuits somehow inferior or flawed? I way prefer the real amps being the test bed for fine tuning the circuit and meeting customer demand, and once an amp has gained a reputation, to then have a digital model of it. Audio DSP engineer's aren't really privy to that kind of customer feedback and refinement, seems a waste to discard it. There's so many amps that get modded to high heaven, and then get reverted back to stock. Almost like those amp designers sometimes know what they're doing....
UA's approach with the Dumble or Rectifier give all the real world switches and modes of the real amps, and allow you to make specific tweaks that make sense for that amp that are still appropriate that that circuit. They're not as deep as Fractal, but they're still controls that a typical user won't be thrown off by. Or conversely, with Lion, just having a few very well regarded models of similar amps is nice and scratches that itch of "its the same but different". The limitations of Ruby never bothered me, nor did I feel the need for a control that affects the punch/smoothness/dynamics because the amps they've chosen to model already sound good.
I'd happily take 3 or 4 different Plexi models, or a MOA Plexi's with switches and tweaks over one model with a hype knob. I'm genuinely surprised that having a preference like that over a hype knob is so controversial to some.
FWIW, there is so much stuff in audio like this:
IRDX Core — Speaker Dynamics Breathe life into your guitar amp sims and cabinet impulse responses. Simply add IRDX Core after your guitar amp or IR loader plugin and discover the natural movement, the 3D sensation, the slightly jagged edges, and the unpredictability you could previously only...
bogrendigital.com
That first make you believe there is a problem, and then they offer you the solution that promises similar kinds of improvements to the tone. How about another hype knob for the cab engine? what about for overdrive pedals and reverbs and delays? What about the compressors? I'm exaggerating of course, but the assumption that an accurate model is simply not good enough just doesn't add up to me. The more betterer knobs the......betterer.
I'll leave this there anyway, I'm clearly in the minority on this one and have made the points I wanted to make. Plus I can't be dealing with KingsXJJ getting carried away thinking he's funny.