Name another company that has charged for functionality in their unit the last 10 years.Simple, just because someone has done something is not proof that everyone must always do it that way. The business model was never produce and sell to the lowest bidders ability to pay.
It has always been balance your profit margin to maintain optimal cash influx.
The market as a whole decides what is viable, not the noisy low bidder.
Line 6 sells you tiered functionality products instead. I’d pay to have amp modeling in HX Effects, but they released the Stomp XL instead.But yet, as mentioned in this thread, Line 6 sells the stomp for a fraction of the price of the flagship and not once have you had to pay to unlock functionality.
There is enough of a price cushion with how Line 6 tiers their products imo. Kemper failed on this.
Those other products have different specs when it comes to the hardware and DSP capabilities. Not a fair comparison surely?Line 6 sells you tiered functionality products instead. I’d pay to have amp modeling in HX Effects, but they released the Stomp XL instead.
If you need a new alt, may I suggest. Linux-GuyTGP so stingy that when your alt gets banned, you can't even change the colour theme!!!
Your assertion depends entirely on your arbitrary indictment of ‘greed’. And it is a bit of a hyperbolic argument.Name another company that has charged for functionality in their unit the last 10 years.
Expecting free updates is not a false premise. It's been the standard. In a world where it seems you get nickel and dimed for everything, it was only a matter of time before a company got greedy and incorporated it into their gear....didn't think it would be Kemper tho.
Nothing about the HX Effects hardware that didn’t allow them to include amp modeling.Those other products have different specs when it comes to the hardware and DSP capabilities. Not a fair comparison surely?
Is that true?Nothing about the HX Effects hardware that didn’t allow them to include amp modeling.
Wow, that’s pretty arrogant. But okay, you’re right. I don’t know shit about the used market.They’ve been in business for over a decade, I’m sure they have a handle on how to compete with used prices better than rando forumites.
Duh.Is that true?
“They know their business”Wow, that’s pretty arrogant. But okay, you’re right. I don’t know shit about the used market.
For you to assume I don’t know anything of which I’m talking about is arrogant, imo. But carry on with the white knighting.Duh.
“They know their business”
“That’s pretty arrogant”
Eh, you can also rip all of your music you already own free and clear, and load it for free onto your phone. Not a great analogy, IMO.I just went to try Apple Music on my iPhone and it’s an additional $10 a month??? I CAN’T BELIEVE that I have to pay to use it! I mean, I ALREADY PAID for my iPhone, so why should I have to PAY for Apple Music?
You’re being offended by things I haven’t said, where did I say you don’t know anything? I know you’re associated to some music shop, but clearly Kemper knows their business better than you do. What’s there to be offended about? Move on.For you to assume I don’t know anything of which I’m talking about is arrogant, imo. But carry on with the white knighting.
Clearly they do. Clearly! Companies never fuck up royally, especially in the MI business! You’re right.You’re being offended by things I haven’t said, where did I say you don’t know anything? I know you’re associated to some music shop, but clearly Kemper knows their business better than you do. What’s there to be offended about? Move on.
Really?I just went to try Apple Music on my iPhone and it’s an additional $10 a month??? I CAN’T BELIEVE that I have to pay to use it! I mean, I ALREADY PAID for my iPhone, so why should I have to PAY for Apple Music?
Well the musicians that create the content being sold need paying.I just went to try Apple Music on my iPhone and it’s an additional $10 a month??? I CAN’T BELIEVE that I have to pay to use it! I mean, I ALREADY PAID for my iPhone, so why should I have to PAY for Apple Music?