Boudoir Guitar
Rock Star
- Messages
- 4,826
Always.Leave.One.Letter.Black. I trust y'all can play Wheel of Fortune with context clues.Hey, at least you know how to colored font where those of us in dark mode can still read the post![]()
Always.Leave.One.Letter.Black. I trust y'all can play Wheel of Fortune with context clues.Hey, at least you know how to colored font where those of us in dark mode can still read the post![]()
I'm going to need a crunch clip with no IR to know what you are referring to.Always.Leave.One.Letter.Black. I trust y'all can play Wheel of Fortune with context clues.
All Tone Knobs On Zero sounds phooked, bruh.I'm going to need a crunch clip with no IR to know what you are referring to.
Dark mode always.Hey, at least you know how to colored font where those of us in dark mode can still read the post![]()
There's offset. In the absence of either vertical or horizontal scales, the level and duration are unknown.You can look at the waveform and see significant DC offset. And DC detection algorithms show DC offset.
Here is a print of the signal with no audio at input, and me zooming in on the waveform. Is there offset or is it symmetrical?
Again, no vertical scale.Here is a DC Offset meter from Izotope on the above for the avoidance of doubt.
Evidence that you only bothered to provide when your original "evidence" turned out to be incorrect.I think there is reasonable evidence to suggest there is DC unintentionally being created from the amp modelling.
Might not be a bad idea. Just sayin'....We can have the electronics class later if you like.
Maybe don't delete, but would probably be a MILLLION times more productive with a lot less bickering if it was "Hey, I saw this weird thing that doesn't seem right to me. Thoughts?" Rather than "I Assert your Product is Broken and I Have Graphs" in a forum where, at best, a single digit percentage of the folks can properly interpret the associated graphs.
Insert House of Learned Doctors gif hereMaybe don't delete, but would probably be a MILLLION times more productive with a lot less bickering if it was "Hey, I saw this weird thing that doesn't seem right to me. Thoughts?" Rather than "I Assert your Product is Broken and I Have Graphs" in a forum where, at best, a single digit percentage of the folks can properly interpret the associated graphs.
I heard the new Prof is in to it.Homepage | Texas ECE - Electrical & Computer Engineering at UT Austin
www.ece.utexas.edu
Last college level physical science class I took did not give credit for answers in Star Trek Meme Format, though.
That sort of stuff isn't new by any means. Clark Kent, aka ML Sound Labs, famously did that on the FAS forum quite a few years ago. As it now turns out, there really is some DC offset produced by the amp block of some Helix models. However, the test that MP shared to demonstrate that in the OP fails to do so. He had to resort to other tests, and only in response to having his errors pointed out to him. You're welcome, MP.Maybe don't delete, but would probably be a MILLLION times more productive with a lot less bickering if it was "Hey, I saw this weird thing that doesn't seem right to me. Thoughts?" Rather than "I Assert your Product is Broken and I Have Graphs"
If this discovery pans out to be valid, I wonder if some ears/brains are more sensitive to it than others.
It might explain why some prefer different products.
Nah, I'm not here to entertain you, this is a bug report thread.Maybe don't delete, but would probably be a MILLLION times more productive with a lot less bickering if it was "Hey, I saw this weird thing that doesn't seem right to me. Thoughts?" Rather than "I Assert your Product is Broken and I Have Graphs" in a forum where, at best, a single digit percentage of the folks can properly interpret the associated graphs.
How do you use spectral analysis to detect DC?I repeat, do not - attempt to use spectral analysis to detect DC. It's possible to do so, but you really have to know what you're doing.
Yeah, I get that, and don't care how we got to that knowledge at this point with the thread being irredeemably messy without a massive group edit, but trying to understand what it means:That sort of stuff isn't new by any means. Clark Kent, aka ML Sound Labs, famously did that on the FAS forum quite a few years ago. As it now turns out, there really is some DC offset produced by the amp block of some Helix models. However, the test that MP shared to demonstrate that in the OP fails to do so. He had to resort to other tests, and only in response to having his errors pointed out to him. You're welcome, MP.
There was clearly enough suggestion of DC that it warranted looking at. I felt it helpful to show that the noise caused by Ripple is different to the DC. The other tests are probably less helpful to the vast majority of musicians who visit this forum.As it now turns out, there really is some DC offset produced by the amp block of some Helix models. However, the test that MP shared to demonstrate that in the OP fails to do so. He had to resort to other tests, and only in response to having his errors pointed out to him. You're welcome