We have these endless discussions of what's wrong with the Fractal UI, saying the same things over and over, yet hardly any activity at all in the actual guitar playing/theory forum. It just makes me wonder how many of those people really play their guitar.
Hell, I should spend more time learning theory and practising. I can acknowledge that!
I see gear as something that either does the things you want, or gets in the way. These are not mutually exclusive. How much they get in the way vs what goes right is usually what determines if something stays or gets sold.
I think everyone has had moments when they just plug in, and the everything sounds so right that you just want to play and play. That's the best case scenario, that's what you get when you have that "perfectly" dialed patch for your Fractal and it just works with the guitar you use.
For me it often goes sideways if I swap guitars. I'd like to do at least some small adjustments to amp settings to accommodate the guitar, but keep the same preset. Or maybe I want to experiment with new sounds from all the fx on offer. That's when I get frustrated by the onboard UI or awkwardly holding my pick while trying to click around in Axe-Edit.
On a real amp, this is a few knob twists and back to playing. Same thing on most pedals. Obviously it's not easy to reconcile offering tons of functionality with super-straightforward usability as e.g Source Audio pedals when using the Neuro Editor run into similar issues.
That's what I like about the QC. It's got a pile of knobs that gets it much closer to that amp+pedals user experience. I'd use that if it had Fractal level fx and amp modeling too. Not that I can't make it work, but I can afford to be picky.
That's why I'm back to pedals and the BluGuitar Amp 1. I was just blasting it today through my 4x10 and it sounded glorious with nothing more than a bit of reverb and delay from the El Cap V2.