deathbyguitar
Roadie
- Messages
- 158
I noticed that the Cygnus X3 thread at TOP was deleted. Such brazen bias on display. Lol.
Yeah... A few usual trolls being trolls and preventing normal discourse on an interesting subject related to Fractal -> instead of "Infractions™" or thread bans, they just delete the whole thingYeah, it's interesting they're just locking, then deleting threads without a single word of explanation now. Eh, whatever.
WE GET IT OKAY! IF ONLY CLIFF WAS AS DEDICATED AS YOU FANBOYS AREWhy would anyone want to talk about Fractal on a modeling sub anyway?
Because we're in the golden age of large companies rehashing the same tech over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over...Why would anyone want to talk about Fractal on a modeling sub anyway?
I think that commercial considerations at TOP are a factor that they aren't here.I noticed that the Cygnus X3 thread at TOP was deleted. Such brazen bias on display. Lol.
I’d like to see a graph of number of deleted fractal vs TBP threads
QFT. I knew/suspected this forever but putting my amps on a switcher proved it beyond a shadow of a doubt. Anything less than a second or two apart is unreliable.I think memory of how things sound is wildly unreliable.
Why would anyone want to talk about Fractal on a modeling sub anyway?
Anything less than a second or two apart is unreliable.
I noticed that the Cygnus X3 thread at TOP was deleted. Such brazen bias on display. Lol.
Neat. Sounds like a wildly different context to me, though.It's not the case with double blind audio testing. Years back JBL/Harman had the freaking coolest listening setup I've ever seen. You have to keep in mind this was back when floor standing tower speakers were popular with big spenders.
Large room divided with an acoustically transparent white linen drape.
One half was the listening area with a couch and a couple recliners. The other was the lab.
You ever see the small tracks they use sometimes for making precision camera shots in movies? They had something like that and would mount the loudspeakers being testing onto little platforms with wheels to move along the track. It was all pretty precision with locking stop points corresponding with the LEFT and RIGHT listening positions of the speakers.
When it came down to final decisions the big wigs would come down with the curtain drawn so they had no clue which was which. The head acoustic guy who worked the A/B switcher was also blind. Only the techs behind the curtain knew.
The actual listening sections were longer pieces of music rather than the usual lick us guitarists would use, but the time gap for speaker switching never played into it, or at least it was never mentioned the few times I was present. I'd guess it was at least 5 seconds to switch speaker pairs.
Really old school shit looking back on it but JBL/Harman was like that back then. They'd even built a full blown half space speaker measurement platform up on their roof for the designers to use during development.
Half Space:
Loudspeaker measurement - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Does the AxeFX have auto tune?
WE GET IT OKAY! IF ONLY CLIFF WAS AS DEDICATED AS YOU FANBOYS ARE
have a good one
m19
No, YOU have a good one.
—PW
FAS has the best modeling in existence…Does anybody know when the FM3 will get gapless switching?
I think it was in the thread that was deleted that I'm pretty sure you were a part of.FAS has the best modeling in existence…Does anybody know when the FM3 will get gapless switching?
Have a good one,
3EO