Fractal Talk

1710952279355.png
 
Why would anyone want to talk about Fractal on a modeling sub anyway?

funny videos fail GIF
Because we're in the golden age of large companies rehashing the same tech over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over...
 
I noticed that the Cygnus X3 thread at TOP was deleted. Such brazen bias on display. Lol.
I think that commercial considerations at TOP are a factor that they aren't here.

Also, the idea that if conflict erupts, instead of deleting the thread the parties here are ushered to a private room to duke it out is a brilliant solution to the bickering problem.
 
Anything less than a second or two apart is unreliable.

It's not the case with double blind audio testing. Years back JBL/Harman had the freaking coolest listening setup I've ever seen. You have to keep in mind this was back when floor standing tower speakers were popular with big spenders.

Large room divided with an acoustically transparent white linen drape.
One half was the listening area with a couch and a couple recliners. The other was the lab.

You ever see the small tracks they use sometimes for making precision camera shots in movies? They had something like that and would mount the loudspeakers being testing onto little platforms with wheels to move along the track. It was all pretty precision with locking stop points corresponding with the LEFT and RIGHT listening positions of the speakers.

When it came down to final decisions the big wigs would come down with the curtain drawn so they had no clue which was which. The head acoustic guy who worked the A/B switcher was also blind. Only the techs behind the curtain knew.

The actual listening sections were longer pieces of music rather than the usual lick us guitarists would use, but the time gap for speaker switching never played into it, or at least it was never mentioned the few times I was present. I'd guess it was at least 5 seconds to switch speaker pairs.

Really old school shit looking back on it but JBL/Harman was like that back then. They'd even built a full blown half space speaker measurement platform up on their roof for the designers to use during development.


Half Space:
 
Last edited:
I noticed that the Cygnus X3 thread at TOP was deleted. Such brazen bias on display. Lol.

Cliff and Fractal do NOT pay to advertise there. It's as simple and straightforward as that.

If they did like other Brands/Retailers then the story would be different.
 
It's not the case with double blind audio testing. Years back JBL/Harman had the freaking coolest listening setup I've ever seen. You have to keep in mind this was back when floor standing tower speakers were popular with big spenders.

Large room divided with an acoustically transparent white linen drape.
One half was the listening area with a couch and a couple recliners. The other was the lab.

You ever see the small tracks they use sometimes for making precision camera shots in movies? They had something like that and would mount the loudspeakers being testing onto little platforms with wheels to move along the track. It was all pretty precision with locking stop points corresponding with the LEFT and RIGHT listening positions of the speakers.

When it came down to final decisions the big wigs would come down with the curtain drawn so they had no clue which was which. The head acoustic guy who worked the A/B switcher was also blind. Only the techs behind the curtain knew.

The actual listening sections were longer pieces of music rather than the usual lick us guitarists would use, but the time gap for speaker switching never played into it, or at least it was never mentioned the few times I was present. I'd guess it was at least 5 seconds to switch speaker pairs.

Really old school shit looking back on it but JBL/Harman was like that back then. They'd even built a full blown half space speaker measurement platform up on their roof for the designers to use during development.


Half Space:
Neat. Sounds like a wildly different context to me, though.

Regardless, unless I personally can A/B stuff directly, with a very short gap, a lot of nuance that I think differs between two amps just isn't always there in the really fine details in a shorter switching gap. I can qualitatively take away things like 'this one was brighter' if they differ grossly for sure. Some differences will stand out more in a direct A/B too that I would miss if they are not dialed similarly, etc. But two genuinely similar amps dialed in to sound similar and then compare? Very often it is hard to pick out which is which without looking.

You can easily do the 'wrong about which one you are adjusting but still somehow manage to hear differences' thing with that kind of setup too.
 
FAS has the best modeling in existence…Does anybody know when the FM3 will get gapless switching?

Have a good one,

3EO
I think it was in the thread that was deleted that I'm pretty sure you were a part of.

Anyway, even if not and you are being sincere. Cliff stated he hopes to get an update out this week. Now will that include gapless switching, not sure. Could be as early as Friday for your answer.
 
Back
Top