- Messages
- 5,447
Which you'd think would be an easy distinction
If you want modeling pay the extra $400

Which you'd think would be an easy distinction
If you want modeling pay the extra $400
Don't know what it is about this product that has caused people's critical thinking skills to go out the window, but I'm totally here for the lulz.
It's honestly with every company nowadays to one degree or another. Exacerbated by the absolute GLUT of killer products out there already where the "need" for something new is tough to justify sometimes.Reminds me of all the outrage about the HX One when it came out
I'm actually happy fractal seems to be going down the different product route than just hammering away at next gen. I know things could be improved on the current lineup but imo, I can't imagine the leap from say the axe III to IV would make much sense at this point.It's honestly with every company nowadays to one degree or another. Exacerbated by the absolute GLUT of killer products out there already where the "need" for something new is tough to justify sometimes.
That's how I feel. TBH I'm not terribly interested in an Axe FX 4, unless it is a real paradigm shift. I don't want a rack unit for a start, it would have to be a full powered floor unit. I wouldn't want the same user experience in terms of having to build shunts manually, and I would want a real move away from the editor application being the main way to interface with the unit to create patches.I'm actually happy fractal seems to be going down the different product route than just hammering away at next gen. I know things could be improved on the current lineup but imo, I can't imagine the leap from say the axe III to IV would make much sense at this point.
However, launching products such as FX only, amp only, etc may be a good introduction to fractal
Don't know what it is about this product that has caused people's critical thinking skills to go out the window, but I'm totally here for the lulz.
I think some of it is really just boredom. Speaking for myself as well as everyone else.I made an observation about this in another thread a month or so ago. For whatever reason, the modelling forums, whether it's here or TGP or wherever, are just nutty.
Companies are making product that 10 years ago we could barely imagine sounding so good and do so many things so well. I can't understand why there's so many 'big feelings'.
Oh, and contrasting this with how many times I've opened Cortex Control since getting the QC.That's how I feel. TBH I'm not terribly interested in an Axe FX 4, unless it is a real paradigm shift. I don't want a rack unit for a start, it would have to be a full powered floor unit. I wouldn't want the same user experience in terms of having to build shunts manually, and I would want a real move away from the editor application being the main way to interface with the unit to create patches.
I want less computer reliance. Not more.
When I had the IRX, while it sounded great, there wasnt anything unique I couldn't get out of a modeler so it just seemed redundantThe Axe stuff, as far as modeling goes; I fire it up and I sincerely don't know how you could use anything else (modeling wise) if sound is your main concern. It's that good. That's where we/the conversation tends to get in the weeds here and elsewhere.
Editing experience and onboard controls of the VP are a great improvement now. I'm honestly circling the IR-D super hard at this point and using the FM3 as a routing box for a bit![]()
Here goes....When I had the IRX, while it sounded great, there wasnt anything unique I couldn't get out of a modeler so it just seemed redundantbut it does add a different user experience I guess?
despite the fact they have absolutely zero music theyâve made with it posted anywhere or a single shred of evidence they even play guitar.
I think some of it is really just boredom. Speaking for myself as well as everyone else.
![]()
To be fair; I have my own Camp. I just picked up my tent and pitched it here insteadI think the aspect of âcreate your own adventureâ with modeling, along with an âunproven track recordâ in the context of historical gear, plays in heavily with the modeling battleground.
IE- Someone buys a JCM800 and itâs cheers all around. Sure, some people donât dig 800âs, but they do what they do and thereâs no questions about a JCM800 not being able to handle a job itâs given.
Then you get into modeling and the floor is opened up to âWell, is the JCM800 modeled as well as it possibly can be? I tried _____ before and their DRRI model sucked so their 800 model probably does, tooâ, âOh their 800 model is so good, unfortunately you have to be an engineer to make it sound goodââŚ.and the plethora of other things modeling introduces because youâre not just plugging into an actual 800.
Then the price of things where people use all kinds of mental gymnastics to justify/speak down to others regarding their purchasing decisions.
Then ya add in some previous experiences with certain brands; one guy gets a Fractal unit and canât spend 10 minutes figuring out how the jog wheel works and when it doesnât work the way he thought it should, he becomes a Camp Survivor and every post he makes after for the next 5 years is how Fractal is too complicated and everyone who owns a Fractal just likes believing theyâre superior.
Then you get the people that actually DO believe theyâre superior because of the modeler they picked, despite the fact they have absolutely zero music theyâve made with it posted anywhere or a single shred of evidence they even play guitar.
Itâs a fun world out there.
I'm sitting here watching FedEx sit on my package an extra day because I chose standard, while it's sitting at their facility 45 minutes away.