Fractal Audio Systems VP4 - Virtual Pedalboard

We need a YouTube influencer dedicated to reviewing the hardware of guitar effects. I asked a question here how the tech specs of the VP4 compared to the SDE-3000EVH and got a very vague response from Fractal. When I started asking specifics they bailed.

EDIT: I just realized I'm not on Fractal's forum.
I have no idea what's inside that particular product so I can't comment on the components.

The published specs don't include any SNR or Dynamic Range specs so I can't compare.
 
Pop Tv Please GIF by Schitt's Creek's Creek

It's time.... at the very least a timeout for some of the worst repeat offenders who
clearly have a PhD. in Miserable Fuckery from Asshat University. :LOL:

Not sorry. They know who they are.

Doing My Part GIF by MOODMAN
 
The only other company that makes a comparable product is ESS and they aren't found in MI products to my knowledge. They're typically used in Hi-Fi gear.

Thanks for commenting on the subject of converters.

One small observation: I was shopping for a new audio interface last week and I noticed that ESS has started to show up in that segment.

For example the new SSL 2 MKII contains a 32 Bit / 192 kHz ESS AD/DA converter.
And the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 features the Sabre32 ES9026PRO DAC.
 
Thanks for commenting on the subject of converters.

One small observation: I was shopping for a new audio interface last week and I noticed that ESS has started to show up in that segment.

For example the new SSL 2 MKII contains a 32 Bit / 192 kHz ESS AD/DA converter.
And the MOTU UltraLite-mk5 features the Sabre32 ES9026PRO DAC.
They have good specs. Good to see them getting some design wins.

The "32-bit" thing still irks me but they're all doing it. There isn't a converter made whose dynamic range is greater than 21 bits.
 
They have good specs. Good to see them getting some design wins.

The "32-bit" thing still irks me but they're all doing it. There isn't a converter made whose dynamic range is greater than 21 bits.

Indeed. I admit that I was initially fooled by the 32-bit thing and totally reeled in.

I was excited at the prospect of 8 more bits being somehow... "obviously" better. just imagine the supreme quality of it all!

Then I looked into what that meant for digital audio in practical terms; and as you suggest, it's meaningless in real world use at present. Pure marketing BS.
 
Last edited:
They have good specs. Good to see them getting some design wins.

The "32-bit" thing still irks me but they're all doing it. There isn't a converter made whose dynamic range is greater than 21 bits.
What specs are Cirrus claiming for their forthcoming products or is it too soon to say?
 
Nice vid LT. Thats where it eats, post in stereo. Throw a dart with some combo of Multi-Delay, Pitch, Plex, and Reverb and it goes hard.

Guitar straight in to the JC120, onboard chorus engaged, VP4 in the stereo loop, stunningly badass clean tones…

Fly Away Reaction GIF
 
The "32-bit" thing still irks me but they're all doing it. There isn't a converter made whose dynamic range is greater than 21 bits.

Do you have any idea how they're spinning the specs to come up with 32-bits? I remember Dave Pensado talking about ProTools having some 48-bit conguration years ago, but that sounded like nonsense to me. It seems like companies can come up with ways to justify saying anything.
 
Do you have any idea how they're spinning the specs to come up with 32-bits? I remember Dave Pensado talking about ProTools having some 48-bit conguration years ago, but that sounded like nonsense to me. It seems like companies can come up with ways to justify saying anything.
The digital I/O is 32 bits. I.e., the TDM data stream has 32 bits per time slot.

It's disingenuous to advertise the converters as "32-bit" though because only 19-20 bits are usable. The rest is noise.
 
Back
Top