It’s definitely not just you! Same here.I still think it'd be fun to mess around with one for a while, but I would need to sell of a good chunk of gear to be able to get anything else.
It looks like it'd be great for a virtual pedalboard, there's a lot of effects in the unit and the skeumorphic design would make it seem a little more like working with a real board.
Maybe it's just me but pedals are super fun to play with because the layout and knobs are so intentional, but I hate having to buy individual pedals and physically get them on a board and cabled up and route power. I've got a Pedaltrain full of Boss pedals that needs to be rewired and would take an afternoon.
It’s definitely not just you! Same here.
Boss just released a single modeling pedal...I know they have the GT and GX series but dammit I really would love if they did some version of the M9.

Maybe the hate comes from the dirt channels? Idk I pretty much always ignored those and never even attempted to work with them
For all I know maybe there’s something there too though
Fwiw, I never got the hate for the HRD. First revision (or revisions?) had that tough to control volume knob, but otherwise it's an incredible pedal platform. Played through one (not mine) for a whole number of rehearsals and two shows, it's been just fine, partially even great. The EQ was working very nicely to adjust your overall sound.
I don’t feel like I’ve seen hate for it, it’s just not sexy.
That's why you slap pedals in front.
Yep, and I think that played a role in the rise of pedalboards and AIAB pedals. Lots of places used Hot Rods as backline, so you bring your pedals, use it as a platform, and you’ve got your familiar sounds anywhere you go
I really enjoyed the time I spent with a TMP last year. It’s WAY better than some around here would lead you to believe
The volume control was finicky up until the latest revision.Fwiw, I never got the hate for the HRD. First revision (or revisions?) had that tough to control volume knob, but otherwise it's an incredible pedal platform. Played through one (not mine) for a whole number of rehearsals and two shows, it's been just fine, partially even great. The EQ was working very nicely to adjust your overall sound.
I really enjoyed the time I spent with a TMP last year. It’s WAY better than some around here would lead you to believe
Here , here. It is a bloody fantastic device. Me thinks 99% of the people who dismiss it have NEVER owned the TMP.
And no, IMHO, it does not count playing it at some music store for a few minutes to an hour. There is NO WAY one has the ability to properly setup and audition any digital modeler in such an environment…at least not to do it justice. So much depends on the sound reinforcement/FRFR/speaker as well as the selection and tweaking of the built-in IR/speaker simulation.
Yes, one can be up and running with the Fender TMP faster then just about any other digital device— nevertheless, I feel one still needs a controlled environment with little to no distractions.
Takes about two minutes to figure out if I want to deal with the workflow/hardware or if the layout and form factor work for me. I knew I didn’t like the TMP because it’s a “flagship” with no EXP pedal.Here , here. It is a bloody fantastic device. Me thinks 99% of the people who dismiss it have NEVER owned the TMP.
And no, IMHO, it does not count playing it at some music store for a few minutes to an hour. There is NO WAY one has the ability to properly setup and audition any digital modeler in such an environment…at least not to do it justice. So much depends on the sound reinforcement/FRFR/speaker as well as the selection and tweaking of the built-in IR/speaker simulation.
Yes, one can be up and running with the Fender TMP faster then just about any other digital device— nevertheless, I feel one still needs a controlled environment with little to no distractions.