ChordInversion
Roadie
- Messages
- 303
Perhaps, but it also constituted a competitive advantage that nobody else (other than Marshall pre-sale) could manage. And it's being squanderd, IMO>I guess my point is that Fender knows implicitly that their offerings wouldn't exclusively be the be-all, end-all except for a small percentage of customers, so a comprehensive offering like this needs to have more.
No, but they sure seem to be trying.Doesn't have to be all things to everyone, and it can't be, really.
They have said that they work in sequence as regards amps - about one per month. So they're doing other amps at the expense of Fenders. They don't seem to be very proud of Fender, to be honest. Look at the models they've offered:But they gotta work on a lot in parallel. Doing this on a linear fashion where they don't bother with ANY other amps until they have exhaustively put up the entire history of Fender amplification is a non-starter, commercially speaking.
Deluxe Reverb (with and without bright cap)
Twin Reverb
Super Reverb
Princeton (standard and reverb)
Tweed Bassman (and two modded versions)
Tweed Deluxe
Then two each of the Bassbreaker and the Blues Junior(!?).
They sure seem to be communicating that they don't think their own company's amp history is especially noteworthy. I mean, the Bassman, DR, and Twin are in the friggin' GT-1000. They've only expanded on the "many budget modelers have them" cliches by three paltry amps and two budget amps. Was anyone really buying a $1600 modeler to get two Blues Juniors and two Bassbreakers, and would they really have been turned off by a Vibrolux Reverb, a Bandmaster Reverb, a Tweed Twin and a Super-Sonic (or a Dual Professional on and on and on)?
It's plain old weird.