We are waiting impatiently for the new algorithms to hit the H9000. How in the hell a 900 dollar pedal gets new algorithms before the flagship 8k dollar processor is a head scratcher. I adore Eventide and always support and sing their praises, but the H9000 should have had these before anything.
Yea no doubt, the H9000 has more than you can ever use, but new stuff should trickle down from the top first. The real power of it is being able to run 16 algos at once. Im not bitching really, if I want an H90 that bad I can get one. I just would like them in the H9000. They said they’re coming, but who doesnt want everything yesterdaY?Isn't there like over 1,000 algorithms in H9000? I think I'd rather have that over 62 in H90, but of course I don't have 8k lol.
Not just me then. The original question is;I think you're spot on. No one can really put their finger on why. Maybe its the older converters, or the better analog signal patch (in the old gear). It's similar to a good new Strat vs a good 1963 Strat. There's just a cool vibey record quality in the older ones.
It reminds me of the old Tyler ad, “you either know or you don’t.”Yeah, "a good new strat vs. a good vintage strat" is so analogous to what you've been saying.
Seems you lean really hard into the latter.It reminds me of the old Tyler ad, “you either know or you don’t.”
Have you ever had any of the gear mentioned? I seriously doubt it by the comment and total lack of engagement with the actual issues.Seems you lean really hard into the latter.
Preference and better are a problem to determine to a point but there is gear that is objectively better sounding. I accept your criticism but cut the insults and shit yourself .I have, and you're generally full of s**t. I say that in the nicest possible way, of course. You continue to have the habit of stating things that you prefer as fact, which is one of the more annoying things about people on the Internet.
Is there a comma missing? Do you want him to cut the insults and shit, insinuating a generic quantity of things akin to insults or do you really want him to cut the insults and then physically shit himself? One is markedly worse than the other so I just want to know where you’re coming from to keep score.Preference and better are a problem to determine to a point but there is gear that is objectively better sounding. I accept your criticism but cut the insults and s**t yourself .
To the point we add all sorts of noise and distortion back into recordings we tried for decades to get rid of. Go figure.Don’t be stupid. Much of modern gear objectively has better components, yet so many of us enjoy the musicality of the old gear, be it analog or digital. You’re just picking and choosing what’s “good”, and calling it “fact”.
It is all about preference.
In the land of beatboxes people chase after that classic old skool MPC sound - it's just 12bit output If I recall correctly. Not even dithered. Just pure bitcrushed. But people mythologize it to such an extent. Kinda funny.
I get it though. I just spent an hour dialing in Helix Native to try and sound closer to my JVMJS via Suhr loadbox. Not for any reason other than to geek out. And you can absolute fall into the pit of tone hunting with it.
Same with comparing modern digital pedals to historic ones. I don't think there's much wrong with a lot of older gear.
I will say, the H90 doesn't sound terrible at all. But I do have other pedals and kit that do these sounds just as well.
I’ve been asked that before on here and the answer is yes. Just because we disagree doesn’t mean I’m inexperienced with the gear.Have you ever had any of the gear mentioned? I seriously doubt it by the comment and total lack of engagement with the actual issues.
Are you experienced?I’ve been asked that before on here and the answer is yes. Just because we disagree doesn’t mean I’m inexperienced with the gear.