- Messages
- 6,489
Well you said "environmental delay" but that isn't how it has been most famously used at all, so I'm confused.The 2290 was one of the first delays to have ducking. I’m not sure what else I have not addressed.
Well you said "environmental delay" but that isn't how it has been most famously used at all, so I'm confused.The 2290 was one of the first delays to have ducking. I’m not sure what else I have not addressed.
Fair, it’s not a good description. I was trying to explain how full it sounds and how it sits so musically with the dry. I was trying to say “real , natural “ huge. The H90 just isn’t imo.Well you said "environmental delay" but that isn't how it has been most famously used at all, so I'm confused.
Fair, it’s not a good description. I was trying to explain how full it sounds and how it sits so musically with the dry. I was trying to say “real , natural “ huge. The H90 just isn’t imo.
He has his preferences which are fine but the hyperbolic “sits on top” and “older rack gear destroys” BS is what turns people off.I honestly think you should have gave it more time. I mean it's only been out a month and a half? Maybe you didn't have it set right or something.
No, but I will.
Thanks for restating what I said earlier in the thread. So you acknowledge that stating things as facts is silly. That’s good. Progress!This is a similar issue to “ better or prefer “
If modern technology and components are objectively better but don’t necessarily sound better in a musical context they aren’t really better in all applications. Analog or digital music players, the new technology is not always better sounding, it has a ton of other advantages but just from the sound quality perspective it is not guaranteed.
Valid point, of course. But the way in which things are stated sometimes is so over the top, it’s the connotation that the poster feels their opinion is more valued than all else.Does every post need to start off with ‘IMO’? Every post here is someone’s opinion in some shape or form. Some of which may be factual. Some of which may not be. That’s where discussion should happen. Even the people who are authorities on the subjects can be wrong, too. It’s all opinion.
In this case I agree, but recognize it’s still just his opinion. He’s perfectly entitled to be wrongValid point, of course. But the way in which things are stated sometimes is so over the top, it’s the connotation that the poster feels their opinion is more valued than all else.
Yeah when the super hyperbolic nonsense kicks in in a post, that takes it beyond “well this is just my point of view” but still I should just pepper their posts with “they’re overly invested in that gear” and let it go but you know…. sometimes you just gotta call it out.Valid point, of course. But the way in which things are stated sometimes is so over the top, it’s the connotation that the poster feels their opinion is more valued than all else.
I’m as invested as one can get in FAS. I have every currently made modeler by them and sold the AX8. I’m not going to say you can’t get a good sound out of a Helix though. I had one of them here and still have the plugin. It’s decent. To that argument I had a rocktron Chameleon 30 years ago that I liked the sound of, too.Yeah when the super hyperbolic nonsense kicks in in a post, that takes it beyond “well this is just my point of view” but still I should just pepper their posts with “they’re overly invested in that gear” and let it go but you know…. sometimes you just gotta call it out.
Edit…. and to be fair I have been the overly invested guy plenty of times.
“Soon”.I’m as invested as one can get in FAS. I have every currently made modeler by them and sold the AX8. I’m not going to say you can’t get a good sound out of a Helix though. I had one of them here and still have the plugin. It’s decent. To that argument I had a rocktron Chameleon 30 years ago that I liked the sound of, too.
I’m sure the QC will be a fine unit someday
its coming“Soon”.
See that’s what drives me nuts with them. Yes, I obviously know developing a plug-in isn’t the same as development for a hardware device. But continually releasing plug-in after plug-in is just shitty optics.its coming
Check out these 30 new plugins in the meantime
Unfortunately they’re not alone in this. UA goes the other way. People have been asking for resizable plugins for a decade or more already.See that’s what drives me nuts with them. Yes, I obviously know developing a plug-in isn’t the same as development for a hardware device. But continually releasing plug-in after plug-in is just sh*tty optics.
Yeah i dipped my toes into UA with just the Golden and Starlight, and sold them off.Unfortunately they’re not alone in this. UA goes the other way. People have been asking for resizable plugins for a decade or more already.
“Hey check out these 4 new guitar pedals”.
No Luna for windows. No resizable plugins. No vst3. Windows drivers are crackle and pop city. I dont get them sometimes.
UA has their hand so far up my ass they’re tickling my tonsils. I own nearly every plugin, 3 rack apollos and 2 PCIe cards. They make some great hardware but some of the business practices are mind numbingly WTFish.Yeah i dipped my toes into UA with just the Golden and Starlight, and sold them off.