“Based on”?

[holoholo]

I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

 

[Sleezy E]

I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

You sir, are a God and none then

 

[Digital Igloo]

You can, OTOH, disclose all the equipment you used to make and process a recording, and it doesn't matter whether or not that disclosure is made in "marketing material," it's a simple fact. Do you really think it's against the law to name the model of spectrum analyzer you use to acquire IRs or impedance data?

So many civil court cases have nothing to do with "against the law." Careful copy is tangential to what's legal, or even ethical. It's about avoiding potentially tens (or hundreds) of thousands of dollars in legal fees, given how many itchy litigious fingers are out there.

 

[la szum]

I hole-hardedly agree, but allow me to play doubles advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go. Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like it’s a peach of cake.

This could be the best thing I have ever read on the Internet!

 

[jay mitchell]

Careful copy is tangential to what's legal, or even ethical. It's about avoiding potentially tens (or hundreds) of thousands of dollars in legal fees, given how many itchy litigious fingers are out there.

In Line6's (or FAS's or Boss's) case, you'd obviously be stepping over a line to call an amp or effects model by the name of its physical counterpart, as you would then be using the IP - a trademark - to imply that your model is somehow equivalent to the physical device.

That's a completely different scenario than providing information about equipment that was used to make a recording. If I say I drove to my destination in an Audi S4, that's nothing more or less than a simple statement of fact; the use of the trademark to designate the vehicle it applies to is the only way to provide that information, and Audi has no basis for action against me. Likewise, if I say I captured an IR using a Bruel & Kjaer 4007 microphone, I'm not in violation of Bruel & Kjaer's intellectual property.

 

[primeholy]

Yup. As a general rule, anyone who laughs too hard at their own material is an awful comedian!

Yeah. You, too, Bert Kreischer!!

Bert Kreischer laughs too much at everything. I really like Tom Segura, but i can’t handle two bears one cave because of Bert

 

[la szum]

And put your shirt back on already.

 

[ejecta]

Bert Kreischer laughs too much at everything. I really like Tom Segura, but i can’t handle two bears one cave because of Bert

 

[Moe45673]

"we tried to model this but gave up"