JiveTurkey
Goatlord
- Messages
- 17,167
My Badlander cabclone worked very intermittently. At best. @Mongillo19 grabbed it and he has had it working. Not a fan of it or the built in load.
To clarify I have not tried the built in load or cabclone. I run into my suhr RL. I just assume it's not worth my time lolMy Badlander cabclone worked very intermittently. At best. @Mongillo19 grabbed it and he has had it working. Not a fan of it or the built in load.
Hear that Cesar?
With Gibson ownership really curious to see where they’ll be in 2-5 years.
I really liked the CabClone IR in the VII. I haven’t tried the older CabClone in amps like the Badlander. Is it not as good?
To me just having a line out tapped from the speaker out would be more than enough. You can then run that to whatever cab sim solution you prefer.I told our rep that they should lower the price of their amps, and take the Cabclone shit out. It doesn’t sound that great, and it’s flaky. He said he personally agrees, but it’s “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” with so many companies building it in these days.
I personally would rather have it as a separate device, particularly when companies like Suhr, Fryette, and St. Rock do a better job.
Mesa was one of the few manufacturers putting slave outs on most of their amps for decades and I’ve always loved that about them. I use the slave out all the time, so useful.To me just having a line out tapped from the speaker out would be more than enough. You can then run that to whatever cab sim solution you prefer.
The one thing I hate is DI outs with undefeatable cab sims. If you don't like what you get then that output just becomes useless.
Yeah Slave Out is the way to go, because you can use it for IR's, you can use it for cool wet/dry setups, etc. It's more useful (and simpler/cheaper) than a CabClone.Mesa was one of the few manufacturers putting slave outs on most of their amps for decades and I’ve always loved that about them. I use the slave out all the time, so useful.
I told our rep that they should lower the price of their amps, and take the Cabclone shit out. It doesn’t sound that great, and it’s flaky. He said he personally agrees, but it’s “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” with so many companies building it in these days.
I personally would rather have it as a separate device, particularly when companies like Suhr, Fryette, and St. Rock do a better job.
Mesa was one of the few manufacturers putting slave outs on most of their amps for decades and I’ve always loved that about them. I use the slave out all the time, so useful.
The problem is that it's USB-B, not USB-C. The load also isn't very good, so it's not useful from that standpoint either, IMO. I'd much rather have a DI-sized IR box to just dual lock onto my cab.CabClone was actually part of the appeal for me with the VII. I like that I can (hopefully) not need my Friedman Mic No Mo and have one less thing to setup/takedown at gigs.
I'm not fussy about the IRs though, I don't think. Just looking for some reinforcement in the mains. If I was recording, etc, it might be different.
The CabClone IR on the Badlander and the VII is very good - it's a 1 IR / non software Torpedo Captor. I definitely like the sound of the Suhr RL better, but there's no doubt the Mesa amps with the newer CCs sound very good.The problem is that it's USB-B, not USB-C. The load also isn't very good, so it's not useful from that standpoint either, IMO. I'd much rather have a DI-sized IR box to just dual lock onto my cab.
I disagree. I don’t care for the Torpedo Captor either. It’s stiff-feeling.The CabClone IR on the Badlander and the VII is very good - it's a 1 IR / non software Torpedo Captor. I definitely like the sound of the Suhr RL better, but there's no doubt the Mesa amps with the newer CCs sound very good.
Lots of internet opinion on amp tones is nonsense and colored by people's feelings about a particular artist, etc. i.e. Some artists the person worships did some classic record with amp 'X', people love that record and want the special sauce. So amp 'X' becomes legendary.When it comes to the IIC vs III, I find the common internet banter around these amps to be really funny. Remember, the Mark III isn’t as good as the Mark II because of the transformer. But the early Dual Rectifiers are superior to the modern DRs because they use the Mark III transformer.
The problem is that it's USB-B, not USB-C.
The load also isn't very good, so it's not useful from that standpoint either, IMO.
I'd much rather have a DI-sized IR box to just dual lock onto my cab.
resistive.How can a load be not good?